Posouzení změn po ukončení psychoterapie (CHAP): Česká verze manuálu

Rolf Sandell, David Holub, Tomáš Řiháček, Jan Roubal a kol.
Anotace

CHAP (Change After Psychotherapy) patří k metodám retrospektivního hodnocení změn prožitku po absolvování psychoterapie. Předkládaná práce v první části vysvětluje problematiku retrospektivního rozhovoru a přibližuje kontext monitorování výsledků psychoterapie pomocí rutinně používaných kvantitativních postupů a nových kvalitativních přístupů. Druhá část uvádí metodiku CHAP a předběžné zkušenosti při hodnocení post-terapeutických změn. Interview vedené v souladu s manuálem CHAP se zaměřuje na prozkoumání subjektivní zkušenosti „změnil jsem se“. Následně hodnotitelé posuzují změny prožitku perspektivou symptomů, schopnosti adaptovat se, vnitřního porozumění, základního konfliktu a mimoterapeutických vlivů. Ve třetí části je uveden v plném rozsahu český překlad manuálu CHAP (Sandell, 1997).

Více informací

E-kniha (PDF)

ISBN-13 978-80-210-9244-0
Počet stran 60
Rok vydání 2019
Pořadí vydání 1., elektronické
doi https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9244-2019

Obecné informace

Jazyky Čeština, Angličtina

Beutler, L. E., & Harwood, T. M. (2000). Prescriptive psychotherapy: A practical guide to systematic treatment selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Britton, R., & Steiner, J. (1994). Interpretation: Selected fact or overvalued idea?. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 75, 1069–1078. Česky vyšlo: Britton, R., & Steiner, J. (2018). Interpretace: Zvolený fakt, nebo přeceněná myšlenka?. Rev. psychoanal. psychoter., 20(1), 101–111.

Desmet, M. (2018, June). The validity of outcome measures. Paper presented at the 49th International Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Doran, J. M., Westerman, A. R., Kraus, J., Jock, W., Safran, J. D., & Muran, J. C. (2015, June). Do all roads lead to Rome? A critical analysis of agreement and divergence in qualitative and quantitative descriptors of change. Poster presented at the 46th International Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Elliott, R., & Rodgers, B. (2008). Client Change Interview. Retrieved from http://www.drbrianrodgers.com/research/client-change-interview

Falkenström, F., Grant, J., Broberg, J., & Sandell, R. (2007). Self-analysis and post-termination improvement after psychoanalysis and long-term psychotherapy. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 629–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651070550020401

Fokkema, M., Smits, N., Kelderman, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2013). Response shifts in mental health interventions: An illustration of longitudinal measurement invariance. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031669

Hardtke, K., & Angus, L. E. (2004). The Narrative Assessment Interview: Assessing self-change in psychotherapy. In L. E. Angus & J. Mcleod (Eds.), The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory, and research (pp. 247–262). London: Sage.

Hill, C. E., Chui, H., & Baumann, E. (2013). Revisiting and reenvisioning the outcome problem in psychotherapy: An argument to include individualized and qualitative measurement. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030571

Krampen, G. (2010). Direct measurement of psychotherapeutic outcomes: Experimental construction and validation of a brief scale. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52(1), 29–47.

Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

Mann, J. (1973). Time-limited psychotherapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

McLeod, J. (2017). Qualitative methods for routine outcome measurement. In T. Rousmaniere, R. K. Goodyear, S. D. Miller, & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training (pp. 99–122). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Neusar, A. (2014). To trust or not to trust? Interpretations in qualitative research. Human Affairs, 24(2), 178–188. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13374-014-0218-9

Pires, P. P., Gonçalves, J., Sá, V., Silva, A., & Sandell, R. (2016). Assessment of change in psychoanalysis: Another way of using the Change After Psychotherapy scales. J Am Psychoanal Assoc., 64(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003065116644743

Rodgers, B., & Elliott, R. (2015). Qualitative methods in psychotherapy outcome research. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcome (pp. 559-578). Wien: Springer.

Rothstein, A. (2002). Reflections on creative aspects of psychoanalytic diagnosing. Psychoanal. Q., 71(2), 301–326.

Roubal, J., Řiháček, T., Čevelíček, M., Hytych, R., & Holub, D. (2018). Retrospective client interviewing can inform clinicians‘ practice and complement routine outcome monitoring. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 27(2), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2018.1058

Sandell, R. (1985). Influence of supervision, therapist’s competence, and patient’s ego level on the effects of time-limited psychotherapy. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 44, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287900

Sandell, R. (1987a). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. I. Analysis and critique of present conventions of estimating change. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287995

Sandell, R. (1987b). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. II. A procedure for direct rating of psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287996

Sandell, R. (1987c). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. III. Reliability and validity of „Change after Psychotherapy“. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287997

Sandell, R. (1987d). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. IV. The incompatibility between the logic of the experiment and the nature of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287998

Sandell, R. (2015a). Change After Psychotherapy (CHAP): Un metodo di valutazione del cambiamento alla fine della psycoterapia. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XLIX(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.3280/PU2015-004004

Sandell, R. (2015b). Rating the outcomes of psychotherapy using the Change After Psychotherapy (CHAP) scales: Manual and commentary. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 18(2), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.7411/RP.2015.111

Sandell, R., Blomberg, J., Lazar, A., Carisson, J., Broberg, J. & Schubert, J. (2001). Rozdíly v dlouhodobých výsledcích u pacientů v psychoanalýze a dlouhodobé psychoterapii. Rev. psychoanal. psychoter., 3(2), 5–23.

Sandell, R., & Wilczek, A. (2016). Another way to think about psychological change: Experiential vs. incremental. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 18(3), 228–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642537.2016.1214163

Sandler, J. (1983). Reflections on some relations between psychoanalytic concepts and psychoanalytic practice. Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 64, 35–45.

Thornton, J. (2018). Depression in adults: campaigners and doctors demand full revision of NICE guidance. BMJ, 361, k2681. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2681

Timuľák, L. (2005). Současný výzkum psychoterapie. Praha: Triton.

Williamson, G. R. (2005). Illustrating triangulation in mixed methods nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 12(4), 7–18.

Zatloukal, L. (2012). Komunikace v psychoterapeutické praxi a terapeutická změna (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://theses.cz/id/ays9yk/00181958-296271926.pdf


Bereiter, C. (1967). Some persisting dilemmas in the measurement of change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Fonagy, P., Steele, M., Steele, H., Target, M., & Schachter, A. (1996, April). Reflective – self functioning manual for application to Adult Attachment Interviews. Confidential Document (Draft 3.3).

Harris, C. W. (Ed.). (1967). Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Horowitz, M. J. (Ed.). (1991). Person schemas and maladaptive interpersonal patterns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lord, F. M. (1967).  Elementary models for measuring change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (Eds.). (1990). Understanding transference: The CCRT method. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Pfeffer, A. (1959). A procedure for evaluating the results of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 418-444. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000306515900700302

Sandell, R. (1987a). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. I. Analysis and critique of present conventions of estimating change. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287995

Sandell, R. (1987b). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. II. A procedure for direct rating of psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287996

Sandell, R. (1987c). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. III. Reliability and validity of „Change after Psychotherapy“. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287997

Sandell, R. (1987d). Assessing the effects of psychotherapy. IV. The incompatibility between the logic of the experiment and the nature of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 47, 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287998

Sandell, R. (1997). Psychotherapeutic change is predictable, spontaneous change is not. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 925-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199712)53:8%3C925::AID-JCLP18%3E3.0.CO;2-M

Schafer, R. (1968). Aspects of internalization. New York, NY: International Universities Press.

Schlessinger, N., & Robbins, F. (1974). Assessment and follow-up in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 22, 542-567. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306517402200305

Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Forty-two lives in treatment: A study of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford.

Weiss, J., Sampson, H., & the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group (1986). The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research. New York, NY: Guilford.

Zilberg, N. J., Wallerstein, R. S., DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D., & Rosenberg, S. E. (1991). A conceptual analysis and strategy for assessing structural change. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14, 317-342.


Zobrazené statistiky se počítají od 25. 5. 2019.

Landing Page


E-kniha (PDF)

E-kniha (Flipbook)


Podobné publikace