Výzkum v didaktice cizích jazyků V

Kapitola

Přesnost v rámci přístupu založeného na úlohách řečového typu: Přehledová studie

Rok vydání: 2022

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0310-2022-2

Abstrakt

Tato přehledová studie mapuje osm výzkumných šetření zabývajících se využitím přístupu založeného na úlohách řečového typu pro rozvoj přesnosti aspektů gramatické kompetence ve výuce cizího jazyka. Ukazuje se, že ve výzkumech převládá zaměření na řečové dovednosti oproti zaměření na jazykové prostředky, a v budoucnu by bylo vhodné hlouběji prozkoumat vliv tohoto přístupu na rozvoj aspektů gramatické a lexikální přesnosti.

Klíčová slova

výuka cizího jazyka, přístup založený na úlohách řečového typu, přesnost, komunikační kompetence, gramatická kompetence


Reference

Abrams, Z., & Rott, S. (2017). Variability and variation of L2 grammar: A cross-sectional analysis of German learners’ performance on two tasks. Language Teaching Research, 21(2), 144–165. Dostupné z https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815627833

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks, second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richard & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (s. 2–27). London: Longman.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases on communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. Dostupné z https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Córdoba Zúñiga, E. (2016). Implementing task-based language teaching to integrate language skills in an EFL program at a Colombian university. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(2), 13–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.49754

Crookes, G., & Gass, S. (Eds.). (1993). Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Dakowska, M. (2011). Teaching English as a foreign language. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Naukowe PWN.

Day, R. (Ed.) (1986). Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fang, W. C., Yeh, H. C., Luo, B. R., & Chen, N. S. (2021). Effects of mobile-supported task-based language teaching on EFL students’ linguistic achievement and conversational interaction. ReCALL, 33(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344020000208

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency: Definitions, measurement, and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.). Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy, and Fluency in SLA (s. 1–20). Amsterdam: Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.01hou

Howatt, A. P. R., & Widdowson, H. G. (2004). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Ji, Y., & Pham, T. (2020). Implementing task-based language teaching (TBLT) to teach grammar in English classes in China: Using design-based research to explore challenges and strategies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1545021

Klippel, F. (1984). Keep talking: Communicative fluency activities for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Macmillan Education Limited. (n.d.). Gen Z. In Macmillan Dictionary. Dostupné z https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/gen-z

Nunan, D. (2000). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Harlow: Longman, Pearson Education.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667336

Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Millennial. In Oxford Learner’s Dictionaries. Dostupné z https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/millennial_2

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024532

Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning teaching: The essential guide to English language teaching. London: Macmillan.

Somawati, N. P., Kanca, N., & Widanta, M. R. J. (2018, October). Implementation of task-based language teaching: To what extent is communicative competence achieved? In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 226. 1st International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icss–18.2018.117

Ur, P. (1981). Discussions that work: Task-centred fluency practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Viriya, C. (2018). Using task-based learning with students of academic English. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 337–346. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.25

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2001). Task-based language learning. In V R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (s. 173–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.026

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.

Xu, J. (2021). A task-based teaching approach with multiple intelligences features in developing Chinese students’ speaking competency. Arab World English Journal, 12(2) 209–221. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.14

Ziegler, N. (2018). Pre-task Planning in L2 Text-chat: Examining learners’ process and performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 193–213. https://doi.org/10125/44664