Adel, A., & Erman, B. (2012). Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes. 31(2), 81-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004

AlHassan, L., & Wood, D. (2015). The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequence in augmenting L2 learner's academic writing skills: A quantitative research study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 51-62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.001

Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Style of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text & Talk, 9(1), 93-124.
https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.93

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (1999). Lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. In: Hasselgard, H., & Osketjell, S. (Eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in hounour of Stig Johansson (pp. 181-189). Amsterodam: Rodopi.

Biber, D., & Barbieri, F. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 263-286.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.003

Borg, E. (2012). Writing differently in Art and Design: Innovative approaches to writing tasks. In Hardy, C., & Clughen, L. (Eds.), Writing in the Disciplines Building Supportive Cultures for Student Writing in UK Higher Education (pp. 1-15). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Conrad, S. M., & Biber, D. (2005). The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica 20(1), 89-115.

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3587951

Čermák, F. (2017). Korpus a korpusová lingvistika. Praha: Karolinum.

Čermák, F. (2010). Lexikon a sémantika. Praha: Lidové noviny.

DeKeyser, R. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oralproficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501-514.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01999.x

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty, & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition (pp. 42-63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(4), 431-469.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010287

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis N. C., Simpson-Vlach R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, Corpus Linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375-396.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x

Flowerdew, L. (1998) Corpus linguistic techniques applied to textlinguistics. System, 26(4), 541-552.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00039-6

Flowerdew, L. (2015). Corpus-based research and pedagogy in EAP: From lexis to genre. Language Teaching, 48(1), 99-116.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000037

Halliday, M. A. K. (1974). Explorations in the functions of language: Explorations in Language Study. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Pearson Education Limited, Longman.

Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourse. In Hyland, K., & Bondi, M. (Eds.), Academic Discourse Across Disciplines (pp. 17-45). Bern: Peter Lang.

Hyland, K. (2008a). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4), 543-562.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235

Hyland, K. (2008b). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001

Hyland, K. (2008c). Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 41-62.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.x

Hyland, K., & Diani, G. (Eds.). (2009). Academic evaluation: review genres in university settings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244290

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 116-127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.003

Hyland, K. (2011). Disciplines and discourses: Social interactions in the construction of knowledge. In D. Starke-Meyerring, A. Paré, N. Artmeva, M. Horne, & L. Yousoubova, (Eds.), Writing in the Knowledge Society (pp. 193-214). West Lafayette, IN: PArlor Press.
https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2011.2379.2.10

Hyland, K. (2017). English in the disciplines: arguments for specificity. ESP Today, 5(1), 5-23.
https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2017.5.1.1

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). In this paper we suggest: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2019). Academic discourse and global publishing: Disciplinary persuasion in changing times. Oxon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433962

Chang, P. (2012). Using a stance corpus to learn about effective authorial stance-taking: a textlinguisticc approach. ReCALL 24(2), 209-236.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000079

Kuteeva, M., & Negretti, R. (2016). Graduate students' genre knowledge and perceived disciplinary practices: Creating a research space across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 41(1), 36-49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.08.004

Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (2017). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Long, M. H. (1997). Focus on form in Task-based language teaching. Working Papers ESI, 16(2), 35-49.

Lirola, M. M. (2015). The use of genre theory for improving writing proficiency skills in explanations. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 20(2), 189-204.
https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v20n2a04

Melles, G., & Lockheart, J. (2012). Writing purposefully in art and design: Responding to converging and diverging new academic literacies. Art and Humanities in Higher Education, 11(4), 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022211432116

Mitchell, R., & Myles F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Hodder Edu.

Molle, D., & Prior, P. (2008). Multimodal genre systems in EAP writing pedagogy: Reflection on a needs analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 42(4), 541-566.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00148.x

Oakey, D. (2020). Phrases in EAP academic writing pedagogy: Illuminating Halliday's influence on research and practice. Journal for Academic purposes, 44. Dostupné z https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158519300359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100829

Parodi, G. (2010). Written discourse genres. Towards an integral conception from a sociocognitive perspective. In G. Parodi (Ed.), Academic and Professional discourse Genre in Spanish (pp. 17-35). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.40.06par

Peters, E., & Pauwels, P. (2015). Learning academic formulaic sequences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 28-39.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.04.002

Pritchard, T. Heatly, R., & Trigwell, K. (2005). How art, media and design students conceive of the relation between the dissertation and practice. Art Design and Communication in Higher Education 4(1), 5-15.
https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.4.1.5/1

Reinders, H., & Hassan, M. (2018). Written corrective feedback: The road ahead. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 6, 1-6.
https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2018.06.01

Santos, M. López-Serrano, S., & Manchón, R. M. (2010). The differential effect of two types of direct written corrective feedback on noticing and uptake: Reformulation vs. error correction. International Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 131-154.
https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/1/114011

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002476

Shirzad, M., Rasekh, A. E., & Dabaghi, A. (2017). The effects of input and output tasks on the learning and retention of EAP vocabulary. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(2), 145-152.
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0702.09

Simpson-Vlach, R. C., & Ellis, N.C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31, 487-512.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058

Sinclair, J.H. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Staff, C., & Farmer, R. (2019). Teaching students to write about art: Results of a four-year patchwork text project. Art and Humanities in Higher Education, 18(2), 137-151.
https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00003_1

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McClair, A. (2013). Formulaic sequence and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 214-225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002

Swaffar, J. K. (1989). Competing paradigms in adult language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), 301-314.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06368.x

Swales, J.M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J.M., & Feak, CH. B. (2000). English in today's research world. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press ELT.
https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9059

Swales, J. M. (2011). Creating Contexts: Writing introductions across genres. University of Michigan: IET.

Wulff, S. (2018). Acquisition of formulaic language from a usage-based perspective. In A. Siyanova-Chanturia, & A. Pellicer-Sanchez (Eds.), Understanding Formulaic Language: A second Language Acquisition Perspective (pp. 25-47). Oxon: Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206615-2