100metod, K. F. M. (2022). 100metod. 100metod. https://kisk.phil.muni.cz/100metod

Ashforth, B. E. (2020). Identity and Identification During and After the Pandemic: How Might COVID‐19 Change the Research Questions we Ask? Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1763–1766. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12629

Ayanso, A., Lertwachara, K., & Vachon, F. (2011). Design and Behavioral Science Research in Premier IS Journals: Evidence from Database Management Research. In H. Jain, A. P. Sinha, & P. Vitharana (Eds.), Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (Vol. 6629, pp. 138–152). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_10

Banbury, A., Pedell, S., Parkinson, L., & Byrne, L. (2021). Using the Double Diamond model to co-design a dementia caregivers telehealth peer support program. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 27(10), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211048980

Bates, M. J. (2011). Úvod do metateorií, teorií a modelů. ProInflow, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2011-1-7

Boisvenue-Fox, M., & Meyer, K. (2019). Not What You Expected: Implementing Design Thinking as a Leadership Practice. In J. A. Crum & S. S. Hines (Eds.), Advances in Library Administration and Organization (Vol. 40, pp. 7–20). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120190000040009

Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design Thinking as Mindset, Process, and Toolbox. In W. Brenner & F. Uebernickel (Eds.), Design Thinking for Innovation (pp. 3–21). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1

Broadbent, D. (2020). Not Another Survey! Use Interviews Instead to Understand Needs in Your Library. Library Leadership & Management, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/llm.v35i1.7447

Clarke, R. (2018). Toward a Design Epistemology for Librarianship. School of Information Studies - Faculty Scholarship. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/694872

Clarke, R. I. (2018). How we done it good: Research through design as a legitimate methodology for librarianship. Library & Information Science Research, 40(3–4), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.007

Culén, A. L., & Gasparini, A. A. (2015). HCI and Design Thinking: Effects on Innovation in the Academic Library. 978-989-8533-38-8, 3–10. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/46216

Gartner. (2022). Definition of Proof of Concept (POC) - Gartner Sales Glossary. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/sales/glossary/proof-of-concept-poc-

Gasparini, A. A. (2019). Design Thinking for Design Capabilities  in an Academic Library [University of Oslo]. https://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/people/aca/almira/phd_gasparini_2020.pdf

Gibbons, S. (2022). Stakeholder Interviews 101. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/stakeholder-interviews/

Goldkuhl, G. (2011). Design Research in Search for a Paradigm: Pragmatism Is the Answer. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 84–95.

Goldkuhl, G. (2016). Separation or unity? Behavioral science vs. design science. AIS SIGPRAG Pre-ICIS Workshop 2016 “Practice-based Design and Innovation of Digital Artifacts.”

Grey, A. (2019). Why the double diamond isn’t enough. UX Collective. https://uxdesign.cc/why-the-double-diamond-isnt-enough-adaa48a8aec1

Haines, K., & Rodgers, E. P. (2021). Creating a contactless pickup service at the University of Michigan library: Iterative service design and interaction safety during the pandemic. Journal of Access Services, 18(4), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15367967.2021.1967162

Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042

Hjørland, B. (2005). Empiricism, rationalism and positivism in library and information science. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410510578050

374. Luca, E., & Ulyannikova, Y. (2020). Towards a User-Centred Systematic Review Service: The Transformative Power of Service Design Thinking. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 69(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1760506

Johnston, M. P. (2014). Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 3(3), 619–626. https://www.qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/169

Káninský, M. (2022, July 1). UX Research & Design Meta Repo (aka the repository of UX repositories). Matěj Káninský. https://matejkaninsky.com/blog/ux-research-design-meta-repository/

Liedtka, J. (2018, September 1). Why Design Thinking Works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/09/why-design-thinking-works

Loh, C. E., Hamarian, E. B. M., Qi, L. L. Y., Lim, Q., & Zee, S. N. Y. (2021). Developing future-ready school libraries through design thinking: A case study. IFLA Journal, 47(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352211028897

Mager, B. (2008). Service Design. In M. Erlhoff & T. Marshall (Eds.), Design Dictionary (pp. 354–357). Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8140-0_244

March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2

Martins, R. (2017). Analysis of Available Design Implementation Methods. A Study About Scarcity of Implementation Methods. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4730–S4733. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352974

Martzoukou, K. (2021). Academic libraries in COVID-19: a renewed mission for digital literacy. Library Management, 42(4/5), 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-09-2020-0131

Newmann, D. (2015). The Design Squiggle. https://thedesignsquiggle.com/

Nielsen, J. (2000). Why You Only Need to Test with 5 Users. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/

Nielsen, J. (2003). Paper Prototyping: Getting User Data Before You Code. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/paper-prototyping/

Ozkaynak, M., Sircar, C. M., Frye, O., & Valdez, R. S. (2021). A Systematic Review of Design Workshops for Health Information Technologies. Informatics, 8(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8020034

Portigal, S. (2013). Interviewing users: how to uncover compelling insights. Rosenfeld Media.

Pyykkö, H., Suoheimo, M., & Walter, S. (2021). Approaching Sustainability Transition in Supply Chains as a Wicked Problem: Systematic Literature Review in Light of the Evolved Double Diamond Design Process Model. Processes, 9(12), 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9122135

Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2004). The questions we ask and the questions we care about: reformulating some problems in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.09.006

Servillo, L., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Pragmatism and Research by Design: Epistemological Virtues and Methodological Challenges. International Planning Studies, 18(3–4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2013.837136

Siemon, D., Becker, F., & Robra-Bissantz, S. (2018). How Might We? From Design Challenges to Business Innovation. Journal of Creativity and Business Innovation, 4(2018). https://www.journalcbi.com/from-design-challenges-to-business-innovation.html

Travers, A., Gregory, O., & Boulton, E. (2013). A Pocket Guide to Interviewing for Research. BookBaby.

Wilson, T. (2007). The Epistemological Dimension of Information Science and its Impact on Library and Archieval Education. Knygotyra, 49, 9–21. https://doi.org/10.15388/kn.v49i0.7991

Zbiejczuk Suchá, L. (2016). Na důkazech založené knihovnictví, akční výzkum a designové myšlení jako teoreticko-metodologické rámce pro informační studia a knihovnictví. ProInflow, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.5817/ProIn2016-1-8

Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., & Evenson, S. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704