Edge of Tomorrow: The Next Generation of Legal Historians and Romanist. Collection of Contributions from the 2022 International Legal History Meeting of PhD Students
KapitolaHistorical Traces of Moral Rights in Common Law
Rok vydání: 2022https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0156-2022-5
Abstrakt
The paper aims to track the traces of moral rights in common law, since it is a usual misconception that common law system of copyright protection is incompatible with the moral rights and the rights were consequently adopted to formally satisfy the international legal framework. The paper firstly outlines the regulatory context in which the rights comparable to continental jurisdictions had the chance to be acknowledged. Then it proceeds to an analysis of doctrinal sources as well as case-law of the highest judicial authorities that have touched upon these questions and developed comparable solutions to the jurisdictions traditionally protecting moral rights.
Klíčová slova
Moral Rights; Intellectual Property; Common Law; Comparative Law.
Reference
BAKER, J. An Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812609.001.0001
BALDWIN, P. The Copyright Wars: Three Centuries of Trans-Atlantic Battle. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851911
BEITZ, Ch. The Moral Rights of Creators of Artistic and Literary Works. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2005, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 330–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00226.x
BIRD, R., PONTE, L. Protecting Moral Rights in the United States and the United Kingdom: Challenges and Opportunities under the U.K.’s New Performances Regulations. Boston University International Law Journal. 2006, Vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 213–282.
BIRNBAUM, J. A. Eines aufrichtigen Patrioten unpartheyische Gedancken über einige Quellen und Wirckungen des Verfalls der ietzigen Buch-Handlung, Worinnen insonderheit Die Betrügereyen der Bücher-Pränumerationen entdeckt, Und zugleich erwiesen wird, Daß der unbefugte Nackdruck unprivilegirter Bücher ein allen Rechten zuwiederlauffender Diebstahl sey. Schweinfurth: Tobias Wilhelm Fischer, 1733.
BLACKSTONE, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England in One Volume, together with A Copious Glossary of Legal Terms Employed; Also Biographical Sketches of Writers Referred to; And a Chart of Descent of English Sovereigns, Edited by WM. Hardcastle Browne, A. M. St Paul: West Publishing Co., 1897.
BLACKSTONE, W. Commentaries on the Laws of England: A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1765–1769, Vol. I Of the Rights of Persons (1765) With an Introduction by Stanley N. Katz. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226163277.001.0001
COBBETT, W. The parliamentary history of England, from the earliest period to the year 1803: from which last-mentioned epoch it is continued downwards in the work entitled, “The parliamentary debates”. London: T. C. Hansard, 1813.
DEAZLEY, R. On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth-Century Britain (1695–1775). Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004.
DWORKIN, G. The Moral Right of the Author: Moral Rights and the Common Law Countries. Columbia-VLA Journal of Law & the Arts. 1994, Vol. 19, no. 3+4, pp. 229–268.
FEATHER, J. Publishing, Piracy and Politics: An Historical Study of Copyright in Britain. London: Mansell Publishing Limited, 1994.
FICHTE, J. G. Beweis der Unrechtmäßigkeit des Büchernachdrucks: Ein Räsonnement und eine Parabel. Berlinische Monatsschrift. 1793, Vol. 21, pp. 443–482.
GIERKE, O. Deutsches Privatrecht: Allgemeiner Teil und Personenrecht. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1893.
GIESEKE, L. Vom Privileg zum Urheberrecht. Die Entwicklung des Urheberrechts in Deutschland bis 1845. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1995.
GUNDLING, N. H. Rechtliches und Vernunfmäßiges Bedenken eines unparteyischen Rechtsgelerhrten über den schändlichen Nachdruck andern gehöriger Bücher. Frankfurt; Leipzig, 1774.
HÖFFNER, E. Geschichte und Wesen des Urheberrechts: Band I. München: Verlag Europäische Wirtschaft, 2011.
KLINCK, D. Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England. London: Routledge, 2010.
KOHLER, J. Urheberrecht an Schriften und Verlagsrecht. Stuttgart: Verlag von Ferdinand Enke, 1907.
MARCUS, E. The Moral Right of the Artist in Germany. Copyright Law Symposium (ASCAP). 1975, Vol. 25, pp. 93–120.
MARVIN, Ch. Author’s Status in the United Kingdom and France: Common Law and the Moral Rights Doctrine. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1971, Vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 675–705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/20.4.675
MORILLOT, A. De la nature du droit d’auteur, considéré à un point de vue général. Revue Critique de Législation et de Jurisprudence. Vol. 27, no. 7, 1878, pp. 111–136.
NETANEL, N. Alienability Restrictions and the Enhancement of Author Autonomy in United States and Continental Copyright Law. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. 1994, Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–78.
PATTERSON, L. Copyright in Historical Perspective. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1968.
RIGAMONTI, C. Deconstructing moral rights. Harvard International Law Journal. 2006, Vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 353–412.
ROEDER, M. The Doctrine of Moral Rights: A Study in the Law of Artists, Authors and Creators. Harvard Law Review. 1940, Vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 554–578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1333995
ROSE, M. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993.
ROSE, M. The Author as Proprietor: Donaldson v. Becket and the Genealogy of Modern Authorship. Representations. 1988, Vol. 23, pp. 51–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928566
ROSE, M. The Author in Court: Pope v. Curll (1741). Cultural Critique. 1992, no. 21, pp. 197–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1354122
ULMER, E. Urheber- und Verlagsrecht. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00570-5