Edge of Tomorrow: The Next Generation of Legal Historians and Romanist. Collection of Contributions from the 2022 International Legal History Meeting of PhD Students

Kapitola

Between Mutuum and Depositum: Deposit of Money under Ius Commune

Václav F. Dvorský
Rok vydání: 2022

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0156-2022-3
Between Mutuum and Depositum: Deposit of Money under Ius Commune pdf, 345KB

Abstrakt

This paper presents opinions of three medieval and early modern civil lawyers on the deposit of fungibles. In order to do that regular and irregular deposit and loan for consumption in Roman law are outlined first. Then the opinions contained in Glossa ordinaria and those of Paulus Castrensis and Philippus Decius are discussed. The first of these considered deposit of fungibles to be a deposit contract, the second one did so only under some circumstances and the last one was against this idea and considered it the loan for consumption. Finally, a short conclusion is given.

Klíčová slova

Fungibles; Custody; Deposit; The Contract of Deposit; Irregular Deposit; Storage; Bailment.

Reference

ACCURSIUS, F. Corpus Iuris Civilis Iustinianei: Tomus Hic Primus Digestum Vetus continent. Lyon: sumptibus Iacobi Cardon [et] Petri Cauellat, 1627.

CASTRENSIS, P. In secundam Digesti veteris partem Patauinae praelectiones. Lyon, 1546.

DECIUS, P. In Digestum Vetus Et Codicem Iustinianeum. Lyon, 1559.

KASER, M. Das Römische Privatrecht, II. Abschnitt: Die Nachklassischen Entwicklungen. München: C. H. Beck, 1975.

KUPISCH, B. In integrum restitutio und vindicatio utilis bei Eigentumsübertragungen im klassischen römischen Recht. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2018.

MICHEL, J.-H. La gratuité en droit romain. ULB: Institut de sociologie, 1962.

NIEMAYER, T. Depositum irregulare. Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1889.

ROTH, H.-J. Alfeni Digesta. Eine spätrepublikanische Juristenschrift. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-49747-8

SONDEL, J. Szczególne rodzaje depozytu w prawie rzymskim. Zeszyty naukowe Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Prace prawnicze. 1967, Vol. 159, no. 30.

ŠEJDL, J. Specifika reálných kontraktů genericky plněných. In: BĚLOVSKÝ, P., STLOUKALOVÁ, K. (eds.). Caro amico: 60 kapitol pro Michala Skřejpka, aneb, Římské právo napříč staletími. Praha: Auditorium, 2017, pp. 422–431.

TURPIN, C. C. Bonae Fidei Iudicia. The Cambridge Law Journal. 1965, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 260–270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300082830

WALTER, T. Die Funktionen der actio depositi. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-53697-9

WATSON, A. The Digest of Justinian II. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998.

WEGMANN STOCKEBRAND, A. On the so-called real contract in the Institutes of Gaius. Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos. 2018, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 97–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-54552018000100097

ZIMMERMANN, R. The law of obligations: Roman foundations of the civilian tradition. Cape Town: Juta & Co, 1990