Cofola International 2021. International and National Arbitration – Challenges and Trends of the Present and Future
KapitolaComparison of ICC Expert Report vs. ICC Arbitration Award Within ADR
Rok vydání: 2021https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8639-2021-14
Abstrakt
The aim of the paper is to compare the ICC Expert proceedings and ICC Arbitration within alternative dispute resolution services provided by the International Chamber of Commerce. These two procee-dings are widely used contractually in conjunction, however their outcomes and effectiveness pursu-ant to the legal framework of the Slovak Republic differ. We aim to outline the important factors to consider when choosing these methods of dispute resolution and their particularities. This contri-bution will contrast the legal nature of ICC Expert Reports and ICC Arbitration Awards and their re-spective recognition and enforceability in the Slovak Republic.
Klíčová slova
International Chamber of Commerce; Expert Determination; Arbitration; Alternative Dispute Resoluti-on.
Reference
BORN, G. B. International Arbitration: Law and Practice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2012, 505 p.
GYÁRFÁŠ, J. et al. Zákon o rozhodcovskom konaní. Komentár. Bratislava: C. H. Beck, 2016, 744 p.
HOMBURGER, B. G. M&A disputes and expert determination: getting to grips with the issues. Thomson Reuters Practical Law [online]. 7 p. [cit. 4. 4. 2021]. Available at: https://content.next.westlaw.com/4-502-2504?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
CHOVANCOVÁ, K. International Commercial Arbitration. Bratislava: Bratislavská vysoká škola práva, 2009, 216 p.
ICC Data Privacy Notice for ICC Dispute Resolution Proceedings [online]. International Chamber of Commerce [cit. 28. 3. 2021]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/icc-data-privacy-notice-for-icc-dispute-resolution-proceedings/
ICC Rules for the Appointment of Experts and Neutrals. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. [cit. 25. 3. 2021]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/experts/icc-rules-appointment-experts-neutrals/rules-for-the-appointment-of-experts-and-neutrals/
ICC Rules for the Proposal of Experts and Neutrals. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. [cit. 15. 3. 2020]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/experts/proposal-experts-neutrals/rules-for-the-proposal-of-experts-and-neutrals/
ICC Rules of Arbitration 2021. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. [cit. 25. 3. 2020]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-of-arbitration/
LALIVE, P. The Transfer of Seat in International Arbitration. In: NAFZIGER, J. A. R. and S. SYMEONIDES (eds.). Law and Justice in a Multistate World: Essays in Honor of Arthur T. von Mehren. Ardsley, New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002, pp. 515–526.
LYSINA, P. et al. Medzinárodné právo súkromné. Bratislava: C. H. Beck, 2016, 544 p.
PRYLES, M. Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses. Journal of International Arbitration [online]. 2001, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 159–176 [cit. 10. 4. 2021]. Available at: https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/18.2/336061
Report on the Public Policy Exception in the New York Convention. IBA Subcommittee on Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award [online]. [cit. 11. 4. 2021]. Available at: https://www.ibanet.org/Document/Default?DocumentUid=C1AB4FF4-DA96-49D0-9AD0-AE20773AE07E
ROGERS, J. and M. BUCKLE. Arbitrating M&A disputes. How the arbitration landscape has changed and where technology might take it next. Norton Rose Fulbright International Arbitration Report [online]. [cit. 25. 3. 2021]. Available at: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/knowledge-pdfs/emea_15747_newsletter__international-arbitration-report-_issue-13.pdf?la=en&revision=6271a007-2aa1-4f13-a15e-0d3251677fdb
SANTENS, A. A. Expert Determination Clauses in Contracts Providing for International Arbitration: What Happens when the Expert’s Decision is Not Final and Binding? Arbitration International, 2007, Vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 687–698. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/23.4.687
SCHERER, M. The Place or ‘Seat’ of Arbitration (Possibility, and/or Sometimes Necessity of its Transfer?) – Some Remarks on the Award in ICC Arbitration No. 10’623. ASA Bulletin, 2003, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 112–119.
Suggested clauses referring to the ICC Rules for the Administration of Expert Proceedings. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. [cit. 10. 4. 2021] Available at: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/experts/administration-experts-proceedings/suggested-clauses-referring-to-the-icc-rules-for-the-administration-of-expert-proceedings/
TOMKO, J. and Z. VALENTOVIČ. Medzinárodné právo súkromné (Všeobecná časť). Bratislava: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 1978, 116 p.
VALASEK, M. and F. WILSON. Distinguishing Expert Determination from Arbitration: The Canadian Approach in a Comparative Perspective. Arbitration International, 2013, Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 63–88. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/29.1.63
2019 ICC Dispute Resolution Statistics. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. 29 p. [cit. 28. 3. 2021]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/publication/icc-dispute-resolution-statistics/