Inquiry in University Mathematics Teaching and Learning. The Platinum Project
KapitolaExperience in Implementing IBME at the Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University
Rok vydání: 2021https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9983-2021-18
Reference
Astafieva, M. M., Zhyltsov, O. B., Proshkin, V. V., Lytvyn, O. S. (2019). E-learning is a means of forming students’ mathematical competence in a research-oriented educational process. In A. Kiv & M. Shyshkina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cloud Technologies in Education (pp. 674–689). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2643/paper40.pdf
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science & Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Brodie, K., Chimhande, T., (2020). Teacher talk in professional learning communities. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(2), 118–130. doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i2.782
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). https://media.bscs.org/bscsmw/5es/bscs_5e_full_report.pdf
Byrnes, J. P., & Wasik, B. A. (1991). Role of conceptual knowledge in mathematical procedural learning. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 777–786. doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.777
Chappell, K. K., & Killpatrick, K. (2003). Effects of concept-based instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and procedural knowledge of calculus. PRIMUS, 13(1), 17–37. doi.org/10.1080/10511970308984043
Cobb, P. (1988). The Tension Between Theories of Learning and Instruction in Mathematics Education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87–103. doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_2
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Haapasalo, L., & Kadijevich, D. (2000). Two types of mathematical knowledge and their relation. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 21(2), 139–157. doi.org/10.1007/BF03338914
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203181522
Hersi, A., Horan, D. A., & Lewis, M. A. (2016). Redefining ‘community’ through collaboration and co-teaching: A case study of an ESOL specialist, a literacy specialist, and a fifth-grade teacher. Teachers and Teaching, 22(8), 927–946. doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1200543
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED410659.pdf
Jaworski, B. (2005). Learning communities in mathematics: Creating an inquiry community between teachers and didacticians. Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 101–119. doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520148
Lauritzen, P. (2012). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematical functions. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Eastern Finland] https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/11481
Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1999). Promoting active learning using the results of physics education research. UniServe Science News, 13, 14–19.
Levchenko, T., (2020). Network pedagogical communities as tools of teacher professional development to the formation of key competencies of students. In: Le tendenze e modelli di sviluppo della ricerche scientifici (pp. 100–102). Collection of Scientifi Works Λ’OΓOΣ. https://ojs.ukrlogos.in.ua/index.php/logos/issue/view/13.03.2020
Maluhin, O. V., & Aristova, N., (2020). Professional development of teachers of general secondary education institutions: Virtual pedagogical communities. In M. Komarytskyy (Ed.) The 3rd International Scientific and Practical Conference – Eurasian Scientific Congress (p. 370).
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Redish E. F., Saul, E. M., & Steinberg, R. M. (1997). On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer-based laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 65(1), 45–54. doi.org/10.1119/1.18498
Solomatin, A. M. (2015). The role of professional communities in the implementation of innovative educational projects. Continuing education: XXI century, 4(12), 6. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2015.2952
Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. www.jstor.org/stable/30034943
Tönnies, F. (2002). [transl. C. Loomis] Community and society. Dover Publications.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Problems of general psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37–285) (translated by N. Minick). Plenum Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Willingham, D. T. (2009-2010). Is it true that some people just can’t do math? American Educator, 39(4), 14–19. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/willingham.pdf