Cohabitation and Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Republic and in the European Context In: COFOLA 2021. Conference for Young Lawyers, part 2 | Munispace

COFOLA 2021. Conference for Young Lawyers, part 2

Kapitola

Cohabitation and Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Republic and in the European Context

Denisa Kotroušová

Rok vydání: 2021

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9981-2021-3

Cohabitation and Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Republic and in the European Context pdf, 296KB

Abstrakt

The contribution deals with a rather narrow topic related to cohabitation – namely with the access of cohabitants to assisted reproduction (ART). The focus is being put primarily on the Czech legal regulation of this issue. Then there is a broader European context added in the contribution. Some European countries are analysed in greater detail, especially if their approach to ART is specific or interesting. In the end, there is reflection of the Czech approach, taking into consideration the differences between the Czech Republic and other European countries.

Klíčová slova

Cohabitation; Assisted Reproduction; Artificial Insemination; Same-sex Couples; Infertile Couple; Infertility Treatment; Parenthood; Children; Paternity.

Reference

CALHAZ-JORGE, C. et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in Europe-an countries. Human Reproduction Open [online]. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1–15 [cit. 24. 5. 2021]. ISSN 2399-3529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz044

FERTILITY EUROPE. Ethics Statements on Medically Assisted Reproduction (MAR): Policy statements on pre-vention and access to treatments. In: fertility europe [online]. 2019, 6 p. [cit. 28. 5. 2021]. Available at: http://www.fertilityeurope.eu/our-projects/ethics-policy-statement/

FIERS, D. Dra een oplossing voor lesbische meemoeders? In: vrt NWS [online]. 4. 1. 2014 [cit. 26. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2014/01/04/dra_een_oplossingvoorlesbischemeemoeders-1-1823193/

FITZPATRICK, M. French Senate approves controversial bioethics law, drops key elements. In: rfi [online]. 4. 2. 2021 [cit. 27. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://www.rfi.fr/en/france/20210204-french-senate-approves-controversial-bioethics-law-drops-key-elements-medically-assisted-procreation-pregnancy-women-s-rights

FRINTA, O. Asistovaná reprodukce – nová právní úprava. Právní fórum [online]. 2007, no. 4, pp. 123–130 [cit. 24. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://www.noveaspi.cz/products/lawText/7/35406/1/2?vtextu=asistovan%C3%A1%20reprodukce%20-%20metoda%20pr%C3%A1vn%C3%AD%20%C3%BApravy#lema0

HOCHL, K. Reproductive medicine in Switzerland – Factsheet. In: SCHAUB HOCHL RECHTSANWÄLTE AG [online]. September 2019, pp. 1–4 [cit. 26. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://schaubhochl.ch/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/FortpflanzungsmedizinFactsheetENDinah30.09.2019.pdf

JOCHOVÁ, J. Bioetický zákon, který zbavuje děti otců, neprošel francouzským Senátem. In: alipro.cz [online]. 25. 6. 2021 [cit. 9. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://alipro.cz/2021/06/25/bioeticky-zakon-ktery-zbavuje-deti-otcu-neprosel-francouzskym-senatem/

KOTROUŠOVÁ, D. Manželství osob stejného pohlaví z pohledu české právní úpravy a jejích navrhovaných změn. Diploma thesis. Pilsen: University of West Bohemia, Faculty of Law, 2020, 165 p.

KONEČNÁ, H. et. al. Rodičem kdykoliv a jakkoliv?. Praha: Mladá fronta, 2017, 256 p. ISBN 978-80-204-4652-7.

LANGLOIS, G. La loi de bioéthique à l‘heure de la révision. In: ActuSoins [online]. 11. 3. 2020 [cit. 27. 5. 2020]. Available at: https://www.actusoins.com/325648/la-loi-de-bioethique-a-lheure-de-la-revision.html

PETRENKO, M. a Z. ZOLÁKOVÁ. Reprodukčná medicína v slovenskom právnom prostredí. In: inVitro [online]. 2017, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93–99 [cit. 26. 5. 2021]. ISSN 1339-5912. Available at: https://issuu.com/alphamedicalinvitro/docs/__asopis_invitro_-_reproduk__n___me

PRÄG, P. and Melinda C. MILLS. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe: Usage and Regulation in the Context of Cross-Border Reproductive Care. In: KREYENFELD M. and D. KONIETZKA (eds.). Childlessness in Europe: Contexts, Causes, and Consequences [online]. Cham: Springer, 2017, pp. 289–309 [cit. 25. 5. 2021]. ISBN 978-3-319-44667-7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44667-7_14

Act no. 14/2006 from the 26May 2006, on Assisted Humar Reproduction Techniques. In: Agencia Estatal Boletín Oficial de Estado [online]. Available at: https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2006-9292

Act no. 373/2011 Coll., on Specific Health Services, as last amended.

Act no. 89/2012 Coll., Civil Code, as last amended.

Bioéthique. Loi relative à la bioéthique. In: SÉNAT. UN SITE AU SERVICE DES CITOYENS [online]. [cit. 9. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://www.senat.fr/dossier-legislatif/pjl19-063.html

Chapter 4: Marital status. In: ORY, Steven J. et al. IFFS Surveillance 2013 [online]. October 2013, pp. 31–34 [cit. 24. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://cdn.ymaws.com/iffs.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/iffs_surveillance_09-19-13.pdf

Comission on European Family Law. THE PRINCIPLES OF EUROPEAN FAMILY LAW REGARDING THE PRO-PERTY, MAINTENANCE AND SUCCESSION RIGHTS OF COUPLES IN DE FACTO UNIONS. In: CEFL. Commission on European Family Law [online]. [cit. 22. 5. 2021]. Available at: http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/English-De-Facto.pdf

Ehe für alle: Zieht die Schweiz nach?. In: humanrights.ch [online]. 19. 5. 2021 [cit. 10. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://www.humanrights.ch/de/ipf/menschenrechte/lgbtiq/schweiz

Federal Act no. 810.11from the 18December, 1998, on Medically Assisted Reproduction. In: Fedlex. The publication platform for federal law [online]. Available at: https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2000/554/en

franceinfo avec AFP. Le projet de loi de bioéthique, dont la PMA pour toutes, sa mesure phare, est définitivement adopté. In: franceinfo [online]. 29. 6. 2021, last update 30. 6. 2021 [cit. 9. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://www.francetvinfo.fr/societe/pma/le-projet-de-loi-de-bioethique-dont-la-pma-pour-toutes-sa-mesure-phare-est-definitivement-adopte_4683331.html

History. In: CEFL. Commission on European Family Law [online]. [cit. 22. 5. 2021]. Available at: http://ceflonline.net/history/

Infertility. In: World Health Organization [online]. 14. 9. 2020 [cit. 24. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infertility

Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights from 24 June 2010, Schalk and Kopf vs. Austria, no. 30141/04.

Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic from the 19July 2012, no. 25 Cdo 754/2010.

Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic from 9 July 2018, no. II. ÚS 955/18.

Judgement of Regional Court in Prešov from the 30March 2021, no. 24CoP/151/2020. In: Slov-Lex. právny a informačný portál [online]. Úrad vlády Slovenskej Republiky. Available at: https://www.slov-lex.sk/sk/vseobecne-sudy-sr/-/ecli/ECLI-SK-KSPO-2021-8120201908_1

Maternity Act, no. 253/2018. In: FINLEX [online]. Available at: https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2018/en20180253

Tab. 550 Hospodařící domácnosti podle počtu členů a podle typu hospodařící domácnosti a způsobu bydlení. In: ČESKÝ STATISTICKÝ ÚŘAD: Veřejná databáze [online]. 26. 3. 2011 [cit. 22. 5. 2021]. Available at: https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/cs/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt-vyhledavani&vyhltext=tab.+550&bkvt=dGFiLiA1NTA.&katalog=all&pvo=SPCR550