XXIV. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků

Kapitola

Metódy monetárneho a nemonetárneho oceňovania ekosystémových služieb - rešerš

Stanislav Kološta, Filip Flaška, Jarmila Makovníková
Rok vydání: 2021

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9896-2021-63
Metódy monetárneho a nemonetárneho oceňovania ekosystémových služieb - rešerš pdf, 479KB

Abstrakt

Porozumenie interakcií medzi vlastnosťami a procesmi ekosystémov má zásadný význam pre hodnotenie ekosystémových služieb (ES) a fungovanie udržateľného rozvoja rôzne veľkých regionálnych celkov. Cieľom príspevku je poskytnúť prehľad o súčasných smeroch výskumu v oblasti hodnotenia a oceňovania ES so zameraním na monetárne a nemonetárne spôsoby oceňovania ES. Analýza odbornej literatúry poskytuje prehľad najčastejšie používaných metód zameraných na monetárne a nemonetárne oceňovanie ES. Nakoľko dochádza k strate a trvalej degradácii ekosystémov, ekonomické hodnotenie ekosystémov a biodiverzity sa považuje za nedostatočné. Na podporu pozitívnych zmien v socio-ekologických systémoch bude potrebné v budúcnosti rozširovať a upravovať spôsoby oceňovania ES o transdisciplinárne hľadiská.

Klíčová slova

ekosystémové služby, hodnotenie, oceňovanie, monetárne, nemonetárne

Reference

  • BABA, C. A. K., HACK, J., (2019). Economic valuation of ecosystem services for the sustainable management of agropastoral dams. A case study of the Sakabansi dam, northern Benin. Ecological Indicators, 107, 105648. ISSN 1470-160X. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105648.
  • Bakshi, B. R., (2000). A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering. Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 24, pp. 1767–1773. ISSN 0098-1354. DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(00)00462-2.
  • Banerjee, O., Crossman, N., Vargas, R., Brander, L., Verburg, P., Cicowiez, M., Hauck, J., McKenzie, E., (2020). Global socio-economic impacts of changes in natural capital and ecosystem services: State of play and new modeling approaches. Ecosystem Services, 46, 101202. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101202.
  • Birkhofer, K., Diehl, E., Andersson, J., Ekroos, J., Früh-Müller, A., Machnikowski, F., Mader, V. L., Nilsson, L., Sasaki, K., Rundlöf, M., Wolters, V., Smith, H. G., (2015). Ecosystem services - current challenges and opportunities for ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 2, ISSN 2296-701X. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2014.00087
  • Brand, A.F., Hynes, J., Walker, L. A., Pereira, M.G., Lawlor, A. J., Williams, R. J., Shore, R. F., Chadwick, E. A., (2020). Biological and anthropogenic predictors of metal concentration in the Eurasian otter, a sentinel of freshwater ecosystems. Environmental Pollution, 266, part 3, 115280, pp. 1-9. ISSN 0269-7491. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115280.
  • Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Müller, F., Windhorst, W., (2009). Landscapes ‘ capacities to provide  ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online, 15, pp. 1-22. ISSN 1865-1542. DOI: 10.3097/LO.200915.
  • Burkhard,, Kandziorai, M. S., Müller, F., (2014).  Ecosystem Service Potentials, Flows and Demands - ConceptsforSpatialLocalisation, Indication and Quantification. Official Journal of the International Association forLandscapeEcology - RegionalChapterGermany (IALE-D). [online]. [cit. 10.3.2021]. Dostupné z: http://www.landscapeonline.de/103097lo201434 
  • Chobotová, V., (2010). Trhový prístup k ekosystémovým službám. Životné prostredie, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 92 – 95. ISSN 0044-4863.
  • CAMPBELL, E., (2018). Revealed social preference for ecosystem services using the eco-price. Ecosystem Services, vol. 30, pp. 267-275. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.009.
  • CAMPBELL, E., MARKS, R., CONN, Ch., (2020). Spatial modeling of the biophysical and economic values of ecosystem services in Maryland, USA. Ecosystem Services, vol. 43, 101093, ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101093.
  • COSTANZA, R., d´ARGE, R., de GROOT, R., FARBER, S., GRASSO, M., HANNON, B., LIMBURG, K., NAEEM, S., O´NEILL, R., PARUELO, J., RASKIN, R., SUTTON, P., BELT, M., (1997). The Value of the World's Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature. vol. 387. pp. 253-260. ISSN 1476-4687. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2.
  • COSTANZA, R., de GROOT, R., SUTTON, P., PLOEG, S., ANDERSON, S. J., KUBISZEWSKI, I., FARBER, S., TURNER, R. K., (2014).Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, pp. 152-158. ISSN 0959-3780. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
  • Černecký, J., Gajdoš, P., Ďuricová, V., Špulerová, J., Černecká, Ľ., Švajda, J., Andráš, P., Ulrych, L., Rybanič, R., Považan, R., (2020). Hodnota ekosystémov a ich služieb na Slovensku. Banská Bystrica: ŠOP SR. ISBN 978-80-8184-078-4.
  • DE GROOT, R. S., WILSON, M. A., BOUMANS, R. M. J., (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 393-408. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7.
  • DE GROOT, R. S., FISCHER, CHRISTIE, M., ARONSON, J., BRAAT, L. et al., (2010). Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem services valuation. In: Kumar, P. (ed.) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. London: Earthscan. ISBN 9781849712125.
  • DE GROOT, R., BRANDER, L., VAN DER PLOEG, S., COSTANZA, R., BERNARD, F., BRAAT, L., CHRISTIE, M., CROSSMAN, N., GHERMANDI, A., HEIN, L., HUSSAIN, S., KUMAR, P., McVITTIE, A., PORTELA, R., RODRIGUEZ, L.C., BRINK, P., VAN BEUKERING, P., (2012). Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 50-61. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
  • DOMINATI, E., PATTERSON, M., MACKAY, A., (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils'. Ecological Economics, vol. 69, pp.1858-1868. ISSN 0921-800. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002.
  • 2009. European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, United Nations, Bank, W. System of National Accounts 2008. EC, IMF, OECD, UN, WB.
  • 2014. European Commission, United Nations, Food and Agriculture Organization, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, The World Bank. System of Environmental Economic Accounting 2012- Central Framework. UN, New York.
  • FARLEY, J., COSTANZA, R., FLOMENHOFT, G., KIRK, D., (2014). The Vermont common assets trust: an institution for sustainable, just and efficient resource allocation. Ecological Economics, vol. 109, pp. 71-79. ISSN 0921-8009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.016.
  • Frélichová, J., Vačkář, D., Pártl, A., Loučková, B., Harmáčková, Z., Lorencová, E. (2014). Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic. Ecosystem Services, vol. 8, pp. 110-117. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.
  • GRIMA, N., SINGH, S.J., SMETSCHA, B., (2018). Improving payments for ecosystem services (PES) outcomes through the use of Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and the software OPTamos. Ecosystem Services, vol. 29, pp. 47-55. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.019.
  • Grizzetti,, Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., Cardoso, A. C., (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 61, pp. 194–203. ISSN 1462-9011. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008.
  • Guerry, A. D., Polasky,, Lubchenco, J., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Daily, G. C., Griffin, R., Ruckelshaus, M., Bateman, I. J., Duraiappah, A., Elmqvist, T., Feldman, M. W., et al. (2015). Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, vol. 112, pp. 7348–7355. ISSN 1091-6490. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
  • HAN, H., GAO, H., HUANG, Y., CHEN, X., CHEN, M., LI, J., (2019). Effects of drought on freshwater ecosystem services in poverty-stricken mountain areas. Global Ecology and Conservation, vol. 17, e00537, pp. 1-14. ISSN 2351-9894. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00537.
  • Heckwolf, M.,, et al., (2021). From ecosystems to socio-economic benefits: A systematic review of coastal ecosystem services in the Baltic Sea. Science of The Total Environment, vol. 755, Part 2, 142565, ISSN 0048-9697. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142565.
  • HU, M., WANG, Y., Xia, B., JIAO, M., HUANG, G., (2020).How to balance ecosystem services and economic benefits? – A case study in the Pearl River Delta, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 271, 110917, ISSN 0301-4797. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110917.
  • Kaiser, , Burkhard, B., Römer, H., Sangkaew, S., Graterol, R., Haitook, T., Sterr, H., Schwartz, D. S., (2013). Mapping tsunami impacts on landcover and related ecosystem service supply in Phang Nga, Thailand. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, vol. 13, pp. 3095-3111. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-3095-2013.
  • KANDZIORA, M., BURKHARD, B., MÜLLER, F., (2013). Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, vol. 28, pp. 54-78. ISSN 1470-160X. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006.
  • Kanianska, R., Jaďuďová, J., Makovníková, J., Kizeková, M., Tomaškin, J., (2016). Ekosystémové služby. Belianum. Vydavateľstvo Univerzity Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici. ISBN 978-80-557-1129-4.
  • KAY, S., GRAVES, A., PALMA, J. H. N. , MORENO, G., ROCES-Díaz, J. V., AVIRON, S., CHOUVARDAS, D., CROUS-DURAN, J., FERREIRO-DOMÍNGUEZ, N., DE JALÓN, S. G., MĂCICĂŞAN, V., MOSQUERA-LOSADA, M. R., PANTERA, A., SANTIAGO-FREIJANES, J. J., SZERENCSITS, E., TORRALBA, M., BURGESS, P. J., HERZOG, F., (2019). Agroforestry is paying off – Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in European landscapes with and without agroforestry systems, Ecosystem Services, vol. 36, 100896. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100896.
  • KROLL, F., Müller,, Haase, D., Fohrer, N., (2012). Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem servicessupply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 521–535. ISSN 0264-8377. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008.
  • LI, G., FANG, C., (2014). Global mapping and estimation of ecosystem services values and gross domestic product: A spatially explicit integration of national ‘green GDP’ accounting. Ecological Indicators, vol. 46, pp. 293-314. ISSN 1470-160X. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.020.
  • Martin, D. M., Mazzotta, M., (2018). Non-monetary valuation using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Sensitivity of additive aggregation methods to scaling and compensation assumptions. Ecosystem services, vol. 29, pp. 13-22. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.022.
  • MEA, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Our Human Planet: Summary for Decision Makers. The Millennium EcosystemA ssessment Series, vol. 5, Island Press: Washington DC. 
  • MEDERLY, P., ČERNECKÝ, J., a kol., (2019). Katalóg ekosystémových služieb Slovenska. Banská Bystrica: ŠOP SR, UKF v Nitre, ÚKE SAV. ISBN 978-80-8184-067-8.
  • MORAVČÍK, M., ČABOUN, V., TUTKA, J. et al., (2008). Výskum, klasifikácia a uplatňovanie funkcií lesa v krajine: Správa pre priebežnú oponentúru úlohy výskumu a vývoja, Zvolen: Národné lesnícke centrum.
  • NAIME, J., MORA, F., SÁNCHEZ-MARTÍNEZ, M., ARREOLA, F., BALVANERA, P., (2020). Economic valuation of ecosystem services from secondary tropical forests: trade-offs and implications for policy making. Forest Ecology and Management, vol. 473, 118294. ISSN 0378-1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118294.
  • NEDKOV, S., BURKHARD, B., (2012). Flood regulating ecosystem services–mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecological Indicators, vol. 21, pp. 67–79. ISSN 1470-160X. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.022.
  • NIETO-ROMERO, M., OTEROS-ROZAS, E., GONZÁLEZ, J. A. , MARTÍN-LÓPEZ, B., (2014). Exploring the knowledge landscape of ecosystem services assessments in Mediterranean agroecosystems: Insights for future research. Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 37, pp. 121-133. ISSN 1462-9011. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.003.
  • OLANDER, L., POLASKY, S., KAGAN, J. S., JOHNSTON, R. J., WAINGER, L.,  SAAH, D., MAGUIRE, L., BOYD, J., YOSKOWITZ, D., (2017). So you want your research to be relevant? Building the bridge between ecosystem services research and practice. Ecosystem Services, vol. 26, pp. 170-182. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.003.
  • Považan, R., (2013). Rekreačné hodnoty NP Veľká Fatra. Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii Environmental management Series, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 82-94. ISSN 1338-4430.
  • Santos-Martín, F., García-Llorente,, Quintas-Soriano, C., Zorrillas-Miras, P., Martín-Lopez, B., Loureiro, M. (2016). Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: Socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of key findings. Madrid, Spain: Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment.
  • Seppelt, R., Dormann, F. C., Eppink, E. V., Lautenbachand, S., Schmidt, S., (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 48, pp. 3630–636. ISSN 1365-2664. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
  • SIKOR, T., HE, J., G. LESTRELIN, G., (2017). Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis Revisited. World Development, vol. 93, pp. 337-349. ISSN 0305-750X. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032.
  • Schröter,, Remme, R. P., Hein, L., (2012). How and where to map supply and demand of ecosystem services for policy-relevant outcomes? Ecological Indicators, vol. 23, pp. 220–221. ISSN 1470-160X. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.03.025
  • Seják, J., Dejmal, I., Petříček, V., Cudlín, P., Míchal, I., Černý, K., Kučera, T. et al., (2003). Hodnocení a oceňovaní biotopů České republiky. Praha.
  • SINARE, H., GORDON, L. J., (2015).Ecosystem services from woody vegetation on agricultural lands in Sudano-Sahelian West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 200, pp. 186-199. ISSN 0167-8809. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.11.009.
  • Tutka, J., Kovalčík, M., Sarvašová, Z., (2011). Hodnotenie verejnoprospešných funkcií lesných ekosystémov : metódy a metodické prístupy. Zvolen: Národné lesnícke centrum – Lesnícky výskumný ústav Zvolen. ISBN 978-80-8093-147-6.
  • Ukidwe, N. U., Bakshi, B. R., (2005). Input-output analysis of economic and ecological systems with application to the U.S. economy. Emergy Synthesis 3: Theory and applications of the emergy methodology. Proceedings from the third biennial emergy conference. Florida: University of Florida.
  • Vačkár, D., Frélichová, J., Lorencová,, Pártl, A., Harmáčková, Z., Loučková, B., (2014). Metodologický rámec integrovaného hodnocení ekosystémových služeb v České republice. Brno: Centrum výzkumu globální změny Akademie věd ČR.
  • Vihervaara, P., Kumpula, T., Ruokolainen, A., Tanskanen, A., Burkhard, B., (2012). Using detailed biotope data for Ecosystem service assessment in Natural protection areas. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services& Management, vol. 8, pp. 169–185. ISSN 2151-3740. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2012.686120.
  • Vihervaara, P., Viinikka, A., Brander, L., Santos-Martín, F., Poikolainen, L., Nedkov, S., (2019). Methodological interlinkages fo mapping ecosystem services – from data to analysis and decision-support. OneEcosystem, 4, 26368. ISSN 2367-8194. DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.4.e26368.
  • Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., Murray, M., (2005). National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
  • Welde, K., Gebremariam, B. 2017. Effect of land use land cover dynamics on hydrological response of watershed: Case study of Tekeze Dam watershed, northern Ethiopia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, vol. 5, pp. 1-16. ISSN 2095-6339. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.03.002.
  • XIE, G., ZHANG, C., ZHEN, L., ZHANG, L., (2017). Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, vol. 26, pp. 146-154. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.010.
  • ZANCHI, G., BRADY, M. V., (2019). Evaluating the contribution of forest ecosystem services to societal welfare through linking dynamic ecosystem modelling with economic valuation, Ecosystem Services, vol. 39, 101011. ISSN 2212-0416. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101011.
  • Yang, Y., Yang, H., Cheng, Y., (2021). Why is it crucial to evaluate the fairness of natural capital consumption in urban agglomerations in terms of ecosystem services and economic contribution? Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 65, 102644. ISSN 2210-6707. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102644.