XXIV. mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků



The paper deals with approaches to support innovation in regions in terms of different functional models of innovation agencies. Attention is focused on national and hybrid innovation agencies that support innovation to address societal challenges in regions. Agencies with this modern approach can be found mainly in the Nordic countries, therefore, we chose innovation agencies in Sweden, Norway and Finland for our research. The aim of this paper is to identify and compare approaches to regional development support of the Nordic national innovation agencies, emphasizing the challenge-oriented side of the measures. As the main research method, three case studies are used to demonstrate the influence of these agencies on regional actors. Each case study provides information on the basic organisation of the agency and the selected programme it implements. The key to selecting the programmes was their regional dimension and an application of a mission-oriented approach. Although all these agencies are generally considered successful and inspiring for other countries, our research has shown that they partially differ in their approach to regional development. For innovation agencies in other countries, the emphasis on the mission-oriented approach can be particularly inspiring. We found differences in the regional activities, establishment of regional offices, overall responsibility of the agency, main topics of interest and approach to mission-oriented policy.

Klíčová slova

innovation, innovation agency, Nordic countries, regional development, mission-oriented policy


  • ASHEIM, B., GRILLITSCH, M., TRIPPL, M., (2015). Regional Innovation Systems: Past - Presence – Future. Papers in Innovation Studies, 2015/36. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE - Center for Innovation Research.
  • COOKE, P., (1992). Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 365-382. ISSN 0016-7185. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9.
  • COOKE, P., (2002). Regional Innovation Systems: General Findings and Some New Evidence from Biotechnology Clusters. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 133-45. ISSN 1573-7047. DOI: 10.1023/A:1013160923450.
  • DOLOREUX, D., DIONNE, S., (2008). Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatière, Canada. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 259-283. ISSN 0898-5626. DOI: 10.1080/08985620701795525.
  • Halásková, M., Gavurová, B., Korony, S., (2020). Change of EU28 countries research and development indicators between 2010 and 2015. Economics & Sociology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 230-248. ISSN 2071-789X. DOI:10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-1/15.
  • HEKKERT, M. P., JANSSEN, M. J., WESSELING, J. H., NEGRO, S. O., (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, vol. 34, pp. 76-79. ISSN 2210-4224. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011.
  • HOWELLS, J., (2005). Innovation and regional economic development: A matter of perspective?. Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1220-1234. ISSN 0048-7333. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.014.
  • INNOVASJON NORGE, (2020). Annual report 2019. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-15]. Available from: https://arsrapport.innovasjonnorge.no/en/arsrapport-2019-eng/#.
  • INNOVASJON NORGE, (2021a). Hvem har fått tilbud om finansiering fra oss?. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.innovasjonnorge.no/no/om/hvem-har-fatt-finansiering-fra-oss2/.
  • INNOVASJON NORGE, (2021b). Bygger verdens mest miljøvennlige møbelfabrikk. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.innovasjonnorge.no/no/tjenester/kundehistorier/2021/vestre/.
  • JARÁBKOVÁ, J., CHRENEKOVÁ, M., ROHÁČIKOVÁ, O., (2019). University and Practice - Cooperation in Research and Science: Case study of the Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra. Quality Innovation Prosperity, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 136-154. ISSN 1335-1745. DOI:10.12776/QIP.V23I1.1168.
  • KRAFTOVÁ, I., KRAFT, J., (2018). The Relationship between Pro-Innovation Factors and the Performance of the European Union Member States and their Regions. Engineering Economics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 424-433. ISSN 1392-2785. DOI:10.5755/j01.ee.29.4.19703.
  • MARTIN, H., (2020). The scope of regional innovation policy to realize transformative change – a case study of the chemicals industry in western Sweden. European Planning Studies, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 2409-2427. ISSN 0965-4313. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1722616.
  • MAZZUCATO, M., (2018). Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European A problem-solving approach to fuel innovation-led growth. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-79-79918-1. DOI: 10.2777/36546.
  • NATIONEN, (2014). Venstre og KrF reagerer på kutt i Innovasjon Norge. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-15]. Available from: https://www.nationen.no/article/venstre-og-krf-reagerer-pa-kutt-i-innovasjon-norge/.
  • OECD, (2011). Maximising the impact of regional innovation agencies. In Regions and Innovation Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 163-185. 10.1787/9789264097803-9-en.
  • OECD, (2021). The design and implementation of mission-oriented innovation policies: A new systemic policy approach to address societal challenges. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, no. 100. Paris: OECD Publishing. ISSN 23074957. DOI: 10.1787/3f6c76a4-en.
  • NO, (2021). Regionalforvaltning.no. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-15]. Available from: https://www.regionalforvaltning.no/Startside/Velkommen.aspx/.
  • NO, (2021). Virkeområdet for distriktsrettet investeringsstøtte er forlenget til 31. desember 2021. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-15]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/tema/kommuner-og-regioner/regional--og-distriktspolitikk/det-distriktspolitiske-virkeomradet/Virkeomradet-for-distriksrettet-investeringsstotte-1-juli-2014--31-desember-2020/id2362281/.
  • Schot, J., Steinmueller, W. E., (2016). Framing Innovation Policy for Transformative Change: Innovation Policy 3.0. [online]. Brighton: University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU). [cit. 2021-04-15]. Available from: https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/framing_innovation_policy_for_tc.pdf.
  • SCHOT, J., STEINMUELLER, W. E., (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, vol. 47, no. 9, 1554-1567. ISSN 0048-7333. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
  • SITRA, (2019a). Annual report and financial statements 2018. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://media.sitra.fi/2019/05/08104654/annual-report-and-financial-statements-2018.pdf.
  • SITRA, (2019b). Summary of Finnish road map to a circular economy 2.0. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://media.sitra.fi/2019/03/20110330/kiertotalouden-tiekartta-tiivistelma-en2.pdf.
  • SITRA, (2021a). Uuden osaamisjärjestelmän alueellisten pilottien rahoitushaku elinikäisen oppimisen toimijoille. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.sitra.fi/artikkelit/uuden-osaamisjarjestelman-alueellisten-pilottien-rahoitushaku-elinikaisen-oppimisen-toimijoille/.
  • SITRA, (2021b). Strategy. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.sitra.fi/en/topics/strategy-2/.
  • SITRA, (2021c). Kestävän talouspolitiikan johtamiskoulutus. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.sitra.fi/aiheet/kestavatalouspolitiikka/.
  • SUORSA, K., (2014). The concept of ‘region’ in research on regional innovation systems. Norwegian Journal of Geography, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 207-215. ISSN 0029-1951. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2014.924025.
  • TURKU, (2021). Circular Turku. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.turku.fi/en/carbon-neutral-turku/circular-turku.
  • United Nations, (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1).
  • VESTRE, (2020). Vestre plans to build the world’s most environmentally friendly furniture factory in Norway. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://vestre.com/news/vestre-plans-to-build-the-worlds-most-environmentally-friendly-furniture-factory-in-norway.
  • VINNOVA, (2016). Vinnväxt: A programme renewing and moving Sweden ahead. Sweden: VINNOVA – Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems/Verket för Innovationssystemcase. ISSN 1650-3120.
  • VINNOVA, (2018). Vinnväxt 2019 – utlysningstext. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.vinnova.se/globalassets/utlysningar/2016-05305/omgangar/utlysningstext_vinnvaxt-2019_reviderad-18-02-27.pdf850162.pdf.
  • VINNOVA, (2019). Visual Sweden. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.vinnova.se/en/p/visual-sweden/.
  • VINNOVA, (2020). Visual Sweden – Stage 2. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.vinnova.se/en/p/visual-sweden---stage-2/.
  • VINNOVA, (2021a). Ten areas for a sustainable future. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-16]. Available from: https://www.vinnova.se/en/our-activities/changing-for-a-sustainable-future/.
  • VINNOVA, (2021b). Our mission. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.vinnova.se/en/about-us/vart-uppdrag/.
  • VISUAL SWEDEN, (2021a). About Visual Sweden. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.visualsweden.se/en/om/.
  • VISUAL SWEDEN, (2021b). Smart Twins for Forest Environment. [online]. [cit. 2021-03-17]. Available from: https://www.visualsweden.se/aktuella-projekt/smart-twin-for-forest-environment/.
  • WANZENBÖCK, I., FRENKEN, K., (2020). The subsidiarity principle in innovation policy for societal challenges. Global Transitions, vol. 2, pp. 51-59. ISSN 2589-7918. DOI: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.002.
  • Wikipedia, (2021). Counties of Norway. [online]. [cit. 2021-04-15]. Available from: Counties of Norway.
  • ŽÍTEK, V., (2016). Změny zaměstnanosti ve výzkumu a vývoji v českých krajích. In mezinárodní kolokvium o regionálních vědách. Sborník příspěvků. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, pp. 289-295. ISBN 978-80-210-8273-1. DOI:10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8273-2016-36.