(Teaching) Regional Geography. Proceedings of 27th Central European Conference. 17th October 2019, Brno

Kapitola

Abstrakt

Small parcels of agricultural land are rare in the present landscape of Czech Republic and become the subject of interests of the state protection of the nature, the landscape and the environment. At the same time, such areas represent interesting subjects for the local administration as attractive tourist object. In the historical territory of Moravia (the eastern 1/3 of the Czech Republic), a regional inventory of areas with preserved ancient land use structure was carried out on all individual cadastral territories (focused not only on small parcels, but also on large aristocratic estates on agricultural and forest land originated before the main wave of industrial revolution Moravia, before 1850. The sites are still subjects to topic economic pressure on land consolidation. Their existence in the future is under threat and is decreasing every year both in number and size. The inventory results are presented on example of the Jeseníky region.

Klíčová slova

terminology, regional specifics, inventory, geo-analysis


Reference

Aalen, F. H. A., Whelan, K., & Stout, M. (Eds.). (1997). Atlas of the Irish Rural Landscape. Cork: Cork University Press.

Antrop, M., & van Eetvelde, V. (2008). The implementation of the Landscape Atlas of Flanders in the integrated spatial planning policy. In M. Berlan-Darqué, Y. Luginbühl, & D. Terrassou, Landscape: from knowledge to action (pp. 137–145). Versailles: Éditions Quae.

Antrop, M. (2002). Results from the recent landscape inventories for building landscape indicators in Belgium. NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape. Oslo: Norway.

Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(1-2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

Bandarin, F. et al. (2009). World Heritage Cultural Landscapes. A Handbook for Conservation and Management. World Heritage Papers, 26. Paris: UNESCO.

Brandt, J., Holmes, E., & Skriver, P. (2001). Urbanisation of the countryside-problems of interdisciplinarity in the study of rural development. In Conference on the Open SPACE Functions under URBAN Pressure. Ghent: Administratie Land- en Tuinbouw.

Bunce, R. G. H., Barr, C. J., Clarke, R. T., Howard, D. C., & Lane, A. M. J. (1996). ITE Merlewood Land Classification of Great Britain. Journal of Biogeography, 23(5), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.1996.tb00023.x

Dramstad, W. E. et al. (2001). Integrating landscape-based values - Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3-4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0

Hreško, J., & Petluš, P. (Eds.) (2015). Atlas archetypov krajiny Slovenska. Nitra: Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa.

Ihse, M. (1996). Monitoring cultural landscapes in Sweden – methods and data of landscape change. In R. H. G. Jongman (Ed.), Ecological and Landscape Consequences of Land Use Change in Europe. Proceedings of the First ECNC Seminar on Land Use Change and its Ecological Consequences (pp. 103–129). Tilburg: ECNC Publication Series on Man and Nature 2.

Klijn, J., & Vos, W. et al. (2000). From landscape ecology to landscape science: proceedings of the European congress „Landscape ecology: things to do – proactive thoughts for the 21st century“, 1997, Dutch Association for Landscape Ecology (WLO). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Lipský, Z. (2010). Present Changes in European Rural Landscapes. In J. Anděl (Ed.), Landscape Modelling. Geographical Space, Transformation and Future Scenarios, Urban and Landscape Perspectives (pp. 13-27). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3052-8_2

Mücher, C. A., et al. (2013). Identification and Characterisation of Environments and Landscapes in Europe. Alterra rapport 832. Wageningen: Alterra.

Pacione, M. (2001). Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203454626

Pinto-Correia, T., Cancela d’Abreu, A., & Oliveira, R. (2002). Landscape areas in Portugal – can they be a support for applying indicators? In NIJOS/OECD Expert Meeting on Agricultural Landscape. Oslo, Norway.

Council Of Europe. (2000). The European Landscape Convention. Florence 20. X. 2000. ETS, No. 176. Strasbourg. Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/html/122.htm.

Slámová, M., &  Jančura, P. (2012). Typológia historických krajinných štruktúr. In Konferencia: Krajina-človek-kultúra. Zvolen: TU vo Zvolene.

Somper, C. (2003). Countryside quality counts: tracking changes in England's landscape. In W. Dramstad, & C. Sogge (Eds.), Agricultural impacts on landscapes: Proceedings from NIJOS/OECD expert meeting on agricultural landscape indicators in Oslo (pp. 157-172). Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Land Inventory.

Nijos, van E. V., & Antrop, M. (2005). The significance of landscape relic zones in relation to soil conditions, settlement pattern and territories in Flanders. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.009

Vos, W., & Klijn, J. (2000). Trends in European landscape development: prospects for a sustainable future. In J. Klijn, & W. Vos (Eds.), From landscape ecology to landscape science: proceedings of the European congress „Landscape ecology: things to do – proactive thoughts for the 21st century“ (pp. 13–30). Dordrecht: Dutch Association for Landscape Ecology (WLO).