Mutual Trust between the Member States of the European Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit: In: Cofola International 2020. Brexit and its Consequences | Munispace

Cofola International 2020. Brexit and its Consequences

Kapitola

Mutual Trust between the Member States of the European Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit:

Radovan Malachta

Rok vydání: 2020

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9801-2020-2

Mutual Trust between the Member States of the European Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit: pdf, 364KB

Abstrakt

The paper follows up on the arguments introduced in the author’s article Mutual Trust as a Way to an Unconditional Automatic Recognition of Foreign Judgments. This paper, titled Mutual Trust between the Member States of the European Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit: Overview discusses, whether there has been a loss of mutual trust between the European Union and the United Kingdom after Brexit. The UK, similarly to EU Member States, has been entrusted with the area of recognition and enforcement of judgements thus far. Should the Member States decrease the level of mutual trust in relation to the UK only because the UK ceased to be part of the EU after 47 years? Practically overnight, more precisely, the day after the transitional period, should the Member States trust the UK less in the light of legislative changes? The article also outlines general possibilities that the UK has regarding which international convention it may accede to. Instead of going into depth, the article presents a basic overview. However, this does not prevent the article to answer, in addition to the questions asked above, how a choice of access to an international convention could affect the level of mutual trust between the UK and EU Member States.

Klíčová slova

Brexit; Mutual Trust; Recognition of Foreign Judgments; Private International Law.

Reference

ARENAS GARCÍA, R. Abolition of Exequatur: Problems and Solutions – Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and Recognition of Foreign Judgements: Too Many Words in the Sea. In: BONOMI, A. and G. P. ROMANO (eds.). Yearbook of Private International Law 2010. Vol. XII. Lausanne: Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2011, pp. 351–375.

CARBALLO PIÑEIRO, L. ‘Brexit’ and International Insolvency Beyond the Realm of Mutual Trust: Brexit and International Insolvency. International Insolvency Review, 2017, Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1283

Declaration/Reservation/Notification: Entry into force. HCCH [online]. 28. 9. 2020 [cit. 23. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/notifications/?csid=1318 &disp=eif

DRLIČKOVÁ, K. Kapitola IV. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N., K. DRLIČKOVÁ, T. KYSELOVSKÁ and J. VALDHANS. Mezinárodní právo soukromé Evropské unie. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2018, 392 p.

GARCIMARTÍN, F. and G. SAUMIER. Explanatory Report on the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. HCCH [online]. 2020, 181 p. [cit. 28. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://assets.hcch.net/docs/a1b0b0fc-95b1-4544-935 b-b842534a120f.pdf

HARTLEY, C. T. Choice-of-court Agreements under the European and International Instruments: the Revised Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention, and the Hague Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 495 p.

HARTLEY, T. and M. DOGAUCHI. Explanatory Report on the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements. HCCH [online]. 8. 11. 2013, 103 p. [cit. 27. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://assets.hcch.net/docs/0de60e2f-e002-408e-98a7-5638e1ebac65.pdf

HAZELHORST, M. Free movement of civil judgments in the European Union and the right to a fair trial. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2017, 445 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-162-3

HESS, B. The Unsuitability of the Lugano Convention (2007) to Serve as a Bridge between the UK and the EU after Brexit. Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law, 2018, no. 2, 10 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3118360

HESS, B. and T. PFEIFFER. Interpretation of the Public Policy Exception as referred to in EU Instruments of Private International and Procedural Law. Directorate-General for Internal Policies [online]. 2011, 178 p. [cit. 24. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2011/453189/IPOL-JURI_ET(2011)453189_EN.pdf

HEYER, J. Výkon cizozemských rozsudků. Zprávy advokacie, 1963, pp. 111–123.

KRAMER, X. Cross-Border Enforcement and the Brussels I-Bis Regulation: Towards a New Balance between Mutual Trust and National Control over Fundamental Rights. Netherlands International Law Review, 2013, pp. 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X12001295

KRAMER, X. Cross-Border Enforcement in the EU: Mutual Trust versus Fair Trial: Towards Principles of European Civil Procedure. International Journal of Procedural Law, 2011, Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 202–230.

KYSELOVSKÁ, T. Kapitola V. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N., K. DRLIČKOVÁ, T. KYSELOVSKÁ and J. VALDHANS. Mezinárodní právo soukromé Evropské unie. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2018, 392 p.

MAHDALOVÁ, S. Evropské insolvenční právo – aktuální trendy, výzvy, budoucnost. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2016, 148 p.

MALACHTA, R. Mutual Trust as a Way to an Unconditional Automatic Recognition of Foreign Judgments. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. (ed.). Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21^st Century. Brno: Masaryk University, 2019, pp. 211–241. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019-11

NÍ SHÚILLEABHÁIN, M. Cross-Border Divorce Law: Brussel II bis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 314 p.

Nová Haagská Úmluva je na světě. Justice.cz [online]. 4. 7. 2019 [cit. 28. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.justice.cz/web/msp/tiskove-zpravy?clanek=nova-haagska-umluva-je-na-sve-1

OBERHAMMER, P. Article 33. In: BORK, R. and K. Van ZWIETEN (eds.). Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 387–396.

POCAR, F. Explanatory Report on the Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. EUR-Lex [online]. 23. 12. 2009, 56 p. [cit. 28. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52009XG1223(04)&from=EN

PRECHAL, S. Mutual Trust Before the Court of Justice of the European Union. European Papers, 2017, no. 1, pp. 75–92.

ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. Instituty českého mezinárodního práva soukromého. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2016, 270 p.

SEDLÁKOVÁ SALIBOVÁ, K. Reciprocity as a Presumption for the Recognition of Foreign Decision. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. (ed.). Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21^st Century. Brno: Masaryk University, 2019, pp. 242–265. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019-12

SIEHR, K. Art. 21. In: MAGNUS, U. and P. MANKOWSKI (eds.). European Commentaries on Private International Law (ECPIL). Commentary Brussels IIbis Regulation. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 2017, pp. 281–287.

Status Table: Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters. HCCH [online]. [cit. 28. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=137

STORSKRUBB, E. Mutual Trust and the Limits of Abolishing Exequatur in Civil Justice. In: BROUWER, E. and D. GERARD (eds.). Mapping Mutual Trust: Understanding and Framing the Role of Mutual Trust in EU Law. EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/13. San Domenico di Fiesiole: European University Institute, 2016, pp. 15–22.

Strengthening cooperation with Switzerland, Norway and Iceland: the Lugano Convention. EUR-Lex [online]. 31. 7. 2018 [cit. 23. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM%3Al16029

Support for the UK’s intent to accede to the Lugano Convention 2007. GOV.UK [online]. 23. 1. 2020 [cit. 23. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/support-for-the-uks-intent-to-accede -to-the-lugano-convention-2007

The Hague Programme: Strengthening Freedom, Security and Justice in the European Union. 2005/C 53/01. EUR-lex [online]. 3. 3. 2005, 14 p. [cit. 20. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005XG0303(01)&from=EN

UMFREVILLE, Ch., P. OMAR, H. LÜCKE et al. Recognition of UK Insolvency Proceedings Post-Brexit: The Impact of a ‘No Deal’ Scenario. International Insolvency Review, 2018, Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 422–444. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.1325

VALDHANS J. Uznání a výkon soudních rozhodnutí. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N., K. DRLIČKOVÁ, T. KYSELOVSKÁ and J. VALDHANS. Úvod do mezinárodního práva soukromého. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2017, 303 p.

Vision and mission. HCCH [online]. [cit. 27. 10. 2020]. Available at: https://www.hcch.net/en/about/vision-and-mission

WALKER, L. Maintenance and Child Support in Private International Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2015, 328 p.

WELLER, M. Choice of court agreements under Brussels Ia and under the Hague convention: coherences and clashes. Journal of Private International Law, 2017, Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 91–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2017.1290416

ZABLOUDILOVÁ, K. Choice of Court Agreements after Brexit. In: ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. (ed.). Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21^st Century. Brno: Masaryk University, 2019, pp. 266–314. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019-13