Výzkum v didaktice cizích jazyků III
KapitolaRole osobních zájmen v odborném anglicky psaném diskurzu a rozvoj dovednosti akademického psaní
Rok vydání: 2020https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9822-2020-6
Abstrakt
Cílem přehledové studie je zmapování výzkumného pole spojeného s tématem míry používání osobních zájmen v odborném, studentském, anglicky psaném diskurzu v České republice a v zahraničí. Práce vymezuje klíčové pojmy, představuje analýzu 14 odborných empirických studií a zodpovídá dvě výzkumné otázky: K jakým hlavním zjištěním dospěl současný výzkum? Jaké metody a přístupy jsou preferované v tomto typu výzkumu?
Klíčová slova
akademické psaní; neosobní styl psaní; osobní zájmena; textový korpus
Reference
Abbuhl, R. (2012). Using self-referential pronouns in writing: The effect of explicit instruction on L2 writers at two levels of proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 501-518.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457739
Çandarlı, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192-202.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001
Čermák, F. (2017). Korpus a korpusová lingvistika. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, nakladatelství Karolinum.
Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2015). Authorial presence in academic writing: A cross-cultural analysis of the use of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragensia, 13(1), 9-30.
Granger, S. (2004). Computer learner corpus research: Current status and future prospects. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 52, 123-145.
https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333772_008
Hsiao-Ling, H. (2015). Writers' realization of self in three types of text. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 109-120.
Hublová, G. (2017). E-learning jako prostředek pro rozvoj cizojazyčného akademického psaní v anglickém jazyce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8819-2017
Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for specific purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002). Options of identity in academic writing. ELT journal, 56(4), 351-358.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.4.351
Hyland, K. (2008). Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4), 543-562.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235
Chang, J. Y. (2015). A Comparison of the First-Person Pronoun I in NS and Korean NNS Corpora of English Argumentative Writing. English Teaching, 70(2), 83-106.
https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.70.2.201506.83
Cherry, R. D. (1998). Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written communication, 15(3), 384-410.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015003009
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5
Károly, K. (2009). Author identity in English academic discourse: A comparison of expert and Hungarian EFL student writing. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 56(1), 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.56.2009.1.1
Lee, J. J., Bychkovska, T., & Maxwell, J. D. (2019). Breaking the rules? A corpus-based comparison of informal features in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing. System, 80, 143-153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.010
Luzón, M. J. (2009). The use of we in a learner corpus of reports written by EFL Engineering students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 192-206.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.04.001
Mair, C., & Leech, G. (2008). Current Changes in English Syntax. The handbook of English linguistics, 36, 318-342.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch14
Mareš, J. (2013). Přehledové studie: jejich typologie, funkce a způsob vytváření. Pedagogická orientace, 23(4), 427-454.
https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-4-427
Martín Martín P. (2003). Personal attribution in English and Spanish scientific texts. BELLS: Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies, 12, n. pag.
Mauranen, A., Hynninen, N. and Ranta, E. (2010). English as an academic lingua franca: The ELFA project. English for Specific Purposes, 29, 183-190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.10.001
McCrostie, J. (2008). Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus-based study. Icame Journal, 32(1), 97-114.
MacIntyre, Robert. (2019). The use of personal pronouns in the writing of argumentative essays by EFL writers. RELC Journal, 50(1), 6-19.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217730139
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for academic purposes, 7(1), 55-67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.005
Sankó, G. (2014). Scholarly texts flavoured with conversational features. Argumentum, 10, 559-574.
Seoane, E. (2013). "On the conventionalisation of the passive voice in Late Modern English scientific discourse". Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 14(1), 70-99.
https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.14.1.03seo
Sudková, M. (2012). Vyjadřování interpersonální funkce v českých a anglických odborných textech. Kontrastivní studie. Časopis pro moderní filologii, 94(1), 31-42.
Taylor, H., & Goodall, J. (2019). A preliminary investigation into the rhetorical function of 'I' in different genres of successful business student academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 135-145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.009
Thaiss, C. J., & Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged writers and dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Vergaro, C. (2011). Shades of impersonality: Rhetorical positioning in the academic writing of Italian students of English. Linguistics and Education, 22(2), 118-132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2010.11.001
Wales, K. (1996). Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, Z. (2019). Carving out a Dialogic Space for "I": A Corpus-Based Study of Novice L2 College Writers' Use of First-Person Pronouns in Argumentative Essays. L2 Journal, 11(1), 20-34.
https://doi.org/10.5070/L20038590