Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Kinanthropology. Sport and Quality of Life. 7. – 9. 11. 2019



The theory of Relative Age Effect (RAE) works on the assumption that athletes born at the beginning of a calendar year are more successful than athletes born in the end of the year. The athletes born early have a significant probability of a higher level of physiological, mor-phological and psychological abilities than later born athletes. Several studies show that the RAE was not found in females or it was significantly lower than in males. The research objective was to find out the influence of RAE in WTA Tour TOP100 female professional tennis players (n=500) in 2014–2018. Cohen’s effect size (ES) w was calculated to assess the level of the influence of RAE. To assess the differences between the observed and the expected relative age quarter distribution, Chi-Square test (ꭕ2) was used. In terms of effect size (ES), a medium influence of RAE has been proven in 2016 and 2017 (w = 0.33, resp. w = 0.30); a small influence has been proven in years 2014, 2015, 2018 and in the whole observed period 2014–2018. Based on statistical analysis, the influence of RAE cannot be rejected in years 2016 (p 0.05). The next step was to assess the influence of RAE on the final WTA ranking in 2014–2018. Players have been divided into four intervals: 1–25, 26–50, 51–75 and 76–100 positions. ES has showed the medium influence of RAE in 76–100 positions (w = 0.34); only small influence of RAE was found in other positions. Statistical analysis showed that the influence of RAE cannot be rejected in 1–25, 26–50 and 76–100 positions (p < 0.05): it can be rejected in 54–75 positions. The results of the research have shown the medium influence of RAE in 2016 and 2017: in the recent years (and in the whole observed period of 2014–2018), the influence of RAE was small. The influence of RAE on the final WTA ranking is also small, except the 76–100 positions.

Klíčová slova

Women´s Tennis Association; date of birth; chronological age; talent; rankings


Abbot, A., & Collins, D. (2004). Eliminating the dichotomy between theory and practice in talent identification and development: considering the role of psychology. Journal of sport science, 22(5),395‒408.

Agricola, A., Zháněl, J., & Hubáček, O. (2013). Relative age effect in junior tennis (male). Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis Gymnica, 43(1), 27‒33.

Arrieta, H., Torres-Unda, J., Gil, S. M., & Irazusta, J. (2016). Relative age effect and performance in the U16, U18 and U20 European Basketball Championships. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(16), 1530‒1534.

Andrade-Souza, V. A., Moniz, F., & Teoldo, I. (2015). Relative age effect in FIFA U17 Emirates 2013 World Cup: analysis of players who effectively participated in the matches. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 21(4), 403‒406.

Baker, J., Janning, C., Wong, H., Cobley, S., & Schorer, J. (2014). Variations in relative age effects in individual sports: Skiing, figure skating and gymnastics. European Journal of Sport Science, 14(1), 183‒190.

Bjerke, Ø., Pedersen, A. V., Aune, T. K., & Lorås, H. (2017). An inverse relative age effect in male alpine skiers at the absolute top level. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 1210.

Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual age-grouping and athlete development. Sports medicine, 39(3), 235‒256.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Costa, A. M., Marques, M. C., Louro, H., Ferreira, S. S., & Marinho, D. A. (2013). The relative age effect among elite youth competitive swimmers. European journal of sport science, 13(5), 437‒444.

Delormé, N., Boiché, J., & Raspaud, M. (2010). Relative Age Effect in Elite Sports: Methodological Bias or Real Discrimination? European Journal of Sport Science 10(2), 91‒96.

Edgar, S., & O’Donoghue, P. (2005). Season of birth distribution of elite tennis players. Journal of sports sciences, 23(10), 1013‒1020.

Filipcic, A. (2001). Birth date and success in tennis. ITF–Coaching & Sport Science Review (23), 9‒11.

Giacomini, G. P. (1999). Association of birthdate with success of nationally ranked junior tennis players in the United States. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 89(2), 381‒386.

Gibbs, B. G., Jarvis, J. A., & Dufur, M. J. (2012). The rise of the underdog? The relative age effect reversal among Canadian-born NHL hockey players: a reply to Nolan and Howell. Int. Review Sociology Sport 47(5), 644–649.

Ford, P. R., & Williams, A. M. (2011). No relative age effect in the birth dates of award-winning athletes in male professional team sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3): 570‒573.

Hancock, D. J. (2017). Female relative age effects and the second-quartile phenomenon in young female ice hockey players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 12–16.

Hancock, D. J., Starkes, J. L., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2015). The relative age effect in female gymnastics: a flip-flop phenomenon. International Journal of Sport Psychology 46(6), 714‒725.

Helsen, W. F., Van Winckel, J., Williams, A. M. (2004). The Relative Age Effect in Youth Soccer across Europe. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 629‒636.

Karcher, C., Ahmaidi, S., & Buchheit, M. (2014). Effect of birth date on playing time during international handball competitions with respect to playing positions. Kinesiology, 46(1), 23‒32.

Lames, M., Augste, C., Dreckmann, C., Görsdorf, K., & Schimanski, M. (2009). The relative age effect in German youth sports: Football, handball and ice-hockey. E-Journal “Bewegung und Training.

Larouche R, Laurencelle L, Grondin S, & Trudeau F. (2010). Influence of birth quarter on the rate of physical activities and sports participation. Journal of Sport Science, 28(6): 627‒631.

Molenaar, C., Geithner, C., Henriksson, T., Fjellman-Wiklund, A., & Gilenstam, K. (2015). The relative age effect in women’s ice hockey: international and positional comparisons. In International Journal of Exercise Science: Conference Proceedings, 8(3), 35.

Musch, J., & Grondin, S. (2001). Unequal Competition as an Impediment to Personal Development: A Review of the Relative Age Effect in Sport. Developmental Review, 21, 147‒167.

O’Donoghue, P. (2009). Relative Age in Elite Tennis. Studies in Physical Culture And Tourism, 16(4), 379–388.

Pacharoni, R., Aoki, M. S., Costa, E. C., Moreira, A., & Massa, M. (2014). Efeito da idade relativa no Tênis. Revista Brasileira de Ciência e Movimento, 22(3), 111‒117.

Parent-Harvey, C. I., Desjardins, C., & Harvey, E. J. (2014). Factors affecting the relative age effect in NHL athletes. Canadian journal of surgery, 57(3), 157.

Romann, M., & Fuchslocher, J. (2014). The need to consider relative age effects in women’s talent development process. Perceptual and motor skills, 118(3), 651‒662.

Sofia, A., Barreiros, A., & Fonseca, A. (2016). The Relative Age Effect in Team Sport: What if we Look at it from a Different View? Talent Development and Excellence, 8(1): 55‒66.

Stenling, A., & Holmström, S. (2014). Evidence of relative age effects in Swedish women’s ice hockey. Talent Development and Excellence, 6(1), 31‒40.

Weir, P. L., Smith, K. L., Paterson, Ch., & Horton, S. (2010). Canadian Women’s Ice Hockey – Evidence of a Relative Age Effect. Talent Development and Excellence, 2: 209‒217.

Ulbricht, A., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Mendez-Villanueva, A., & Ferrauti, A. (2016). Impact of fitness characteristics on tennis performance in elite junior tennis players. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 30(4), 989‒998.