Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Kinanthropology. Sport and Quality of Life. 7. – 9. 11. 2019Kapitola
The Relative Age Effect in the Top 100 ATP Tennis Players 2016–2018Rok vydání: 2020
The issue of the Relative Age Effect (RAE) has been monitored in the field of sports for more than 30 years. Its theoretical framework is based on the premise that during the pubescent period athletes born at the beginning of the year experience earlier biological acceleration re-sulting in a higher level of physiological, mental, morphological and psychological attributes than their later-born peers. A number of publications show that this temporary advantage often manifests itself in elite competitions at the junior level, but gradually disappears during the transition to professional senior competitions. The aim of this work was to determine the level of the RAE in the elite 100 ATP tennis players (ATP Rankings) in 2016–2018. To assess the influence of the RAE, the Chi-Squared (ꭕ2) test in the variant of Goodness of Fit was used for the assessment of the conformity of expected and observed frequency distribution due to the categorical character of the research data and the large sample size. The Cohen’s w val-ue calculation was used to assess the effect size (ES, since it is not a random representative selection of elements of the research set) of the ꭕ2 test values. The odds ratio (OR) was used to assess the chance of players from the Q individual quarters to get among the best 100 players. The results show that, in terms of effect size (ES), the effect of birth date in all the Top 100 players is small (w = .22) during the entire observed period 2016–2018; the influence of RAE is therefore dismissed. The ES in the individual years is again small (w = .21–.25); the influence of RAE is also dismissed. In analysing the effect of birth date, the mean rate of effect size was found in tennis players in positions 1 to 25 (w = .46) as well as in tennis play-ers in positions 51 to 75 (w = .37); the RAE influence is therefore not rejected. Only a small measure of effect size was found between positions 26 to 50 and 76 to 100 (w = .21–.25); the RAE influence is rejected. No statistically significant difference has been found between the observed and expected distribution of birth date between the observed quarters of the year (odds ratio test, p > .05) and it has not, therefore, been proven that tennis players from any of the quarters Q –Q had a better chance of getting among the Top 100 tennis players. It can be concluded that professional senior tennis had not shown the RAE influence to the extent usual in junior categories during the observed period of 2016–2018.
biological acceleration; birth date; sports talent; professional; ATP Rankings
Agricola A., Zháněl, J., & Bozděch, M. (2017). The comparison of the influence of the age effect between elite junior male and female tennis players. In M. Zvonař, & Z. Sajdlová (eds.). The 11th International Conference on Kinanthropology. 313–321.
Agricola, A. (2013). Vplyv age effect v tenise (Dissertation paper). Retrieve from https://theses.cz/ id/2ntau5/Adrian_Agricola_Age_Effect_v_tenise_Diz__praca.pdf
Albuquerque, M. R., Lage, G. M., & Da Costa V. T. (2012). Relative age effect in olympic taekwondo athletes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.2466/05.25.PMS.114.2.461-468
Barnsley, R., Thompson, A., & Barnsley, P. (1985). Hockey success and birthdate: the relative age effect. Cahper Journal, 51(8), 23–28.
Bozděch, M., Nykodým, J., Agricola A., & Zháněl, J. (2017). The relative age effect in the world junior tennis finals 2012-2016 (male). In M. Zvonař, & Z. Sajdlová (eds.). The 11th International Conference on Kinanthropology. 322–330.
Cobley, S., Baker, J., Wattie, N., & McKenna, J. (2009). Annual Age-Grouping and Athlete Development A Meta-Analytical Review of Relative Age Effects in Sport. Sports medicine, 39(3), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939030-00005
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed). Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cote, J., Macdonald, D. J., Baker, J., & Abernethy, B. (2006). When “where” is more important than ”when”: Birthplace and birthdate effects on the achievement of sporting expertise. Journal of sports sciences, 24(10), 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500432490
Delorme, N., Boiché, J., & Raspaud, M., (2009). The Relative Age Effect in Elite Sport, Research quarterly for exercise and Sport, 80(2), 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599568
Edgar, S., & O’Donoghue, P. (2005). Season of birth distribution of elite tennis players. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(10), 1013–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410400021468
Filipcic, A. (2001). Birth date and success in tennis. ITF coaching & sport science Rview, 9(23), 9–11.
Giacomini, G. P. (1999). Association of birthdate with success of nationally ranked junior tennis players in the united states. Perceptzral and Motor Skills, 89(2), 381–386. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.19220.127.116.111
Green, D. R., & Simmons, S. V. (1962). Chronological age and school entrance. The Elementary School Journal, 63(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/460009
Grondin, S., Deshaies, P., & Nault, L. (1984). Trimestres de naissance et participation au hockey et au volleyball. La Revue Québécoise de l’Activité Physique, 2(3), 97–103. doi: hdl.handle. net/20.500.11794/373
Gutiérrez Aguilar, O., Saavedra García, M., & Fernández Romero, J. J. (2017). Constituent year effect in international handball at high level. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 12(2), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.122.08
Jeronimus, B. F., Stavrakakis, N., Veenstra, R., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2015). Relative Age Effects in Dutch Adolescents: Concurrent and Prospective Analyses. Plos One, 10(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128856
Koloničný, R., Bozděch, M., & Zháněl, J. (2018). Longitudinal study of the influence of the relative age effect (rae) on Czech tennis players aged 10–12. Studia sportiva, 12(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.5817/StS2018-1-14
Loffing, F., Schorer, J., & Cobley, S. P. (2010). Relative Age Effects are a developmental problem in tennis: but not necessarily when you’re left-handed!. High ability studies, 21(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.488084
Müller, L., Gehmaier, J., Gonaus, Ch., Raschner, Ch., & Müller, E. (2018). Maturity Status Strongly Influences the Relative Age Effect in International Elite Under-9 Soccer. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 17(2), 216–222
Müller, L., Hildebrandt, C., Schnitzer, M., & Raschner, C. (2016). The Role of a Relative Age Effect in the 12th Winter European Youth Olympic Festival in 2015. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 122(2), 701–718. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516640390
Müller, L., Müller, E., Hildebrandt, C., & Raschner, C. (2016). Biological Maturity Status Strongly Intensifies the Relative Age Effect in Alpine Ski Racing. Plos One, 11(8), e0160969. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0160969
O’Donoghue, P. (2009). Relative Age in elite tennis. Studies in Physical Culture & Tourism, 16(4), 379–388.
Pacharoni, R., Aoki, M. S., Costa, E. C., Moreira, A., & Massa, M. (2014). Efeito da idade relativa no Tênis. Revista Brasileira De Ciência E Movimento, 22(3), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.18511/0103-1716/rbcm.v22n3p111-117
Sánchez-Rodríguez, C., Grande, I., Sampedro, J., & Rivillagarcía, J. (2013). Is the date of birth an advantage/ally to excel in handball?. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 8(3), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.4100/jhse.2013.8.Proc3.22
Ulbricht, A., Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Mendez-Villanueva, A., & Ferrauti, A. (2015). The Relative Age Effect and Physical Fitness Characteristics in German Male Tennis Players. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 14(3), 634–642.
Van den Honert, R. (2012). Evidence of the relative age effect in football in Australia. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(13), 1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2012.707329
Werneck, F., Coelho, E., de Oliveira, H., Ribeiro Júnior, D., Almas, S., de Lima, J., ... Figueiredo, A. (2016). Relative age effect in Olympic basketball athletes. Science & Sports, 31(3),158–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2015.08.004