Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century

Kapitola

Mutual Trust as a Way to an Unconditional Automatic Recognition of Foreign Judgments

Radovan Malachta
Rok vydání: 2019

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9497-2019-11
Mutual Trust as a Way to an Unconditional Automatic Recognition of Foreign Judgments pdf, 360KB

Abstrakt

The article covers a topic of an unconditional automatic recognition of foreign judgments within the European Union. Thus far, a different method in case of foreign judgments has been used. Certain regulations of the EU require exequatur and contain grounds for refusal of recognition and in certain regulations both the exequatur and grounds for refusal of recognition have been abolished. First, the paper deals with the principle of mutual trust (what mutual trust is and in what to trust). Subsequently, the article points out the differences between the principle of mutual trust and the principle of mutual recognition. Finally, it discusses the notion of automatic recognition in the context of free movement of judgments within the EU.

Klíčová slova

Mutual Trust; Mutual Recognition; Automatic Recognition; Foreign Judgment; Refusal of Recognition; Public Policy; European Union.

Reference

Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme 2010. COM(2010) 171 final [online]. EUR-lex. Published on 19 April 2010, 69 p. [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0171:FIN:EN:PDF

Arenas García, R. Abolition of Exequatur: Problems and Solutions – Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and Recognition of Foreign Judgements: Too Many Words in the Sea. In: Bonomi, A., Romano, G. P. (eds.). Yearbook of Private International Law 2010. Vol. XII. Lausanne: Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2011, pp. 351–375.

Baratta, R. Complexity of EU law in the domestic implementing process [online]. 19th Quality of Legislation Seminar ‘EU Legislative Drafting: Views from those applying EU law in the Member States’. Brussels, 3 July 2014 [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://ec.europa.eu/dgs/legal_service/seminars/20140703_baratta_speech.pdf

Bogdan, M. Private International Law as Component of the Law of the Forum. General Course on Private International Law. In: Recueil des cours 2010. Vol. 348. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2011, pp. 9–252.

Bork, R. Recognition and Enforcement. In: Bork, R., Mangano, R. European Cross-Border Insolvency Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, 188 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780684659

Dickinson, A. Free Movement of Judgments in the EU: Knock Down the Walls but Mind the Ceiling. In: Lein, E. (ed.). The Brussels I Review Proposal Uncovered. London: The British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2012, pp. 135–164.

Dickinson, A. The Revision of the Brussels I Regulation. In: Bonomi, A., Romano, G. P. (eds.). Yearbook of Private International Law 2010. Vol. XII. Lausanne: Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2011, pp. 247–309.

Drličková, K. Kapitola IV. In: Rozehnalová, N., Drličková, K., Kyselovská T., Valdhans, J. Mezinárodní právo soukromé Evropské unie. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2018, 389 p.

European Commission [online]. Justice in the EU. Flash Eurobarometer 385. 2013, 144 p. [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/flash/fl_385_en.pdf

Fallon, M., Kruger, T. The Spatial Scope of the EU´s Rules on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments: From Bilateral Modus to Unilateral Universality? In: Bonomi, A., Romano, G. P. (eds.). Yearbook of Private International Law 2012/2013. Vol. XIV. Lausanne: Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2013, pp. 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866539778.1

Franzino, P. L’universalisation partielle du régime européen de la compétence en matière civile et commerciale dans le règlement Bruxelles I bis: une mise en perspective. In: Guinchard, E. (ed.). Le nouveau règlement Bruxelles I bis. Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2014, pp. 39–82.

Hazelhorst, M. Free movement of civil judgments in the European Union and the right to a fair trial. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2017, 445 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-162-3

Hess, B., Pfeiffer, T. Interpretation of the Public Policy Exception as referred to in EU Instruments of Private International and Procedural Law [online]. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Published in 2011, 177 p. [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2011/453189/IPOL-JURI_ET(2011)453189_EN.pdf

Heyer, J. Výkon cizozemských rozsudků. Zprávy advokacie. 1963, pp. 111–123.

Kramer, X. Cross-Border Enforcement and the Brussels I-Bis Regulation: Towards a New Balance between Mutual Trust and National Control over Fundamental Rights. Netherlands International Law Review. 2013, pp. 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X12001295

Kramer, X. Cross-Border Enforcement in the EU: Mutual Trust versus Fair Trial: Towards Principles of European Civil Procedure. International Journal of Procedural Law. 2011, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 202–230.

Kučera, Z., Pauknerová, M., Růžička, K. et al. Mezinárodní právo soukromé. Plzeň-Brno: Aleš Čeněk-Doplněk, 2015, 430 p.

Lagarde, P. Public Policy. In: Kurt, L. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Vol. 3. Tübingen: J. C. Mohr, 1991, 61 p.

Mahdalová, S. Evropské insolvenční právo – aktuální trendy, výzvy, budoucnost. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2016, 148 p.

Mehren, A. T. von. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements – General Theory and the Role of Jurisdictional Requirements. In: Recueil des courses 1980. Vol. 167. Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff & Noordhoff, 1981, pp. 9–112.

Mitsilegas, V. The Limits of Mutual Trust in Europe’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: From Automatic Inter-State Cooperation to the Slow Emergence of the Individual. Yearbook of European Law. 2012, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 319–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yes023

Mosconi, F. Exceptions to the Operation of Choice of Law Rules. In: Recueil des cours 1989. Vol. 217. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990, pp. 9–214.

Oberhammer, P. Article 33. In: Bork, R., Van Zwieten, K. (eds.). Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 387–396.

Pachl, L. Nařízení Rady (ES) o úpadkovém řízení. In: Kozák, J., Budín, P. Insolvenční zákon a předpisy související. Komentář. Praha: ASPI, 2008, pp. 983–1100.

Pauknerová, M. § 4. In: Pauknerová, M., Rozehnalová, N., Zavadilová, M. et al. Zákon o mezinárodním právu soukromém. Komentář. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2013, 853 p.

Pontier, J. A., Burg, E. EU Principles on Jurisdiction and Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2004, 270 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-619-0

Prechal, S. Mutual Trust Before the Court of Justice of the European Union. European Papers. 2017, No. 1, pp. 75–92.

Presidency Conclusions [online]. Tampere European Council. 15 and 16 October 1999 [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/21059/tampere-european-council-presidency-conclusions.pdf

Siehr, K. Art. 21. In: Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. (eds.). European Commentaries on Private International Law (ECPIL). Commentary Brussels IIbis Regulation. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 2017, pp. 281–287.

Steiner, V. Některé teoretické koncepce řešení otázky uznání a výkonu cizího rozhodnutí. Časopis pro mezinárodní právo. 1970, pp. 239–248.

Storskrubb, E. Mutual Trust and the Limits of Abolishing Exequatur in Civil Justice. In: Brouwer, E., Gerard, D. (eds.). Mapping Mutual Trust: Understanding and Framing the Role of Mutual Trust in EU Law. EUI Working Paper MWP 2016/13. San Domenico di Fiesiole: European University Institute, 2016, pp. 15–22.

The EU Justice Agenda for 2020–Strengthening Trust, Mobility and Growth within the Union COM(2014) 144 final [online]. EUR-lex. Published on 11 March 2014, 10 p. [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0144
&from=EN

The Hague Programme: Strengthening Freedom, Security and Justice in the European Union. 2005/C 53/01 [online]. EUR-lex. Published on 3 March 2005 [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52005XG0303(01)&from=EN

The Stockholm Programme – an Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens. 2010/C 115/01 [online]. EUR-lex. Published on 4 May 2010 [cit. 20. 10. 2019]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:115:0001:0038:EN:PDF

Valdhans, J. Uznání a výkon cizích rozhodnutí. In: Rozehnalová, N., Drličková, K., Kyselovská T., Valdhans, J. Úvod do mezinárodního práva soukromého. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2017, 303 p.

Veder, M. Article 19 and 20. In: Bork, R., Van Zwieten, K. (eds.). Commentary on the European Insolvency Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 307–322.

Walker, L. Maintenance and Child Support in Private International Law. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2015, 328 p.

Wautelet, P. Article 35. In: Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. (eds.). European Commentaries on Private International Law (ECPIL). Commentary Brussels Ibis Regulation. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 2016, 1163 p.

Weller, M. Mutual trust: in search of the future of European Union private international law. Journal of Private International Law. 2015, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 64–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2015.1033203

Zilinsky, M. Mutual Trust and Cross-Border Enforcement of Judgments in Civil Matters in the EU: Does the Step-by-Step Approach Work? Netherlands International Law Review. 2011, pp. 115–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-017-0079-0