Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century

Kapitola

Abstrakt

The aim of this article is to analyze the development of the EU conflict of law rules for contractual and non-contractual obligations with international element concerning intellectual property rights. The main focus of the analysis is the legislative history of Rome I Regulation and Rome II Regulation and the development of respective conflict of law rules and connecting factors.

Klíčová slova

European Union; Conflict of Law Rules; Intellectual Property Rights; Private International Law; Contractual Obligations; Rome I Regulation; Non-contractual Obligations; Rome II Regulation; Infringement; License Contract.


Reference

Bělohlávek, A. J. Římská úmluva a nařízení Řím I. Komentář v širších souvislostech evropského a mezinárodního práva soukromého. 1. díl. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2009, 1316 p.

Commentary on Principles of Private International Law on Intellectual Property Rights (Joint Proposal Drafted by Members of the Private International Law Association of Korea and Japan [online]. Waseda University Global COE Project. Published in October 2010 [cit. 15. 11. 2019]. http://www.win-cls.sakura.ne.jp/pdf/28/08.pdf

Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I) [online]. EUR-Lex. Published on 15 December 2005 [cit. 21. 10. 2019]. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/com/com_com(2005)0650_/com_com(2005)0650_en.pdf

Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Non-contractual Obligations (Rome II) [online]. EUR-Lex. Published on 22 July 2003 [cit. 2. 11. 2019]. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2003/EN/1-2003-427-EN-F1-1.Pdf

Commission of the European Communities. Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II”) (presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 250 (2) of the EC Treaty) [online]. EUR-Lex. Published in 2006 [cit. 13. 11. 2019]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52006PC0083&from=CS

Council Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations by Mario Giuliano and Paul Legrade. In: Official Journal No C 282/1 of 31 October 1980.

Council of the European Union. Common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (“Rome II”) [online]. consilium.europa.eu. Published on 11 August 2006 [cit. 25. 10. 2019]. https://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%209751%202006%20INIT

De La Durantaye, K. Article 8 Rome II. In: Callies, G.-P. Rome Regulations: Commentary. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2015, pp. 495–657.

De Miguel Asensio, P. A. The Law Governing International Intellectual Property Licensing Agreements (A Conflict of Laws Analysis) [online]. Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Licensing. Published in 2013, pp. 312–336 [cit. 5. 8 2019]. https://eprints.ucm.es/18063/1/pdemiguelasensio-IP_Licensing_2013.pdf. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781005989.00021

European Max-Planck Group for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property (CLIP). Comments on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (“Rome I”) of 15 December 2005 and the European Parliament Committee on Legal Affairs Draft Report on the Proposal of August 22, 2006 [online]. Max-Planck Institut. Published on 4 January 2007, 7 p. [cit. 10. 10. 2019]. https://www.ip.mpg.de/fileadmin/ipmpg/content/stellungnahmen/comments-contractualobligations_01.pdf

European Parliament. Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) [online]. EUR-Lex. Published in 2005, p. 25 [cit. 15. 11. 2019]. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&reference=A6-2005-0211&language=EN

European Max Planck Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property. Basedow, J. (ed.). Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property. The CLIP Principles and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, 560 p.

Fawcett, J. J., Torremans, P. Intellectual Property and Private International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, 1056 p.

Hamburg Group for Private International Law. Comments on the European Commission’s Draft Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations [online]. law.duke.edu [cit. 17. 11. 2019]. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1987&context=faculty_scholarship

Christie, A. F. Private international law principles for ubiquitous intellectual property infringement – a solution in search of a problem? Journal of Private International Law. 2017, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 152–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2017.1304047

Illmer, M. Article 8. In: Huber, P. Rome II Regulation. Pocket Commentary. Munich: Sellier, European Law Publishers, 2011, pp. 64–286.

Kono, T., Jurčys, P. General Report. In: Kono, T. (ed.). Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012, pp. 1–216.

Kono, T. et al. Transparency Proposal on Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Intellectual Property. In: Basedow, J., Kono, T., Metzger, A. Intellectual property in the Global Arena: Jurisdiction, Applicable law, and the Recognition of Judgments in Europe, Japan and the US. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010, pp. 394–402.

Kučera, Z., Pauknerová, M., Růžička, K. et al. Mezinárodní právo soukromé. Plzeň– Brno: Aleš Čeněk-Doplněk, 2015, 430 p.

Kur, A., Maunsbach, U. Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights [online]. Oslo Law Review. 2019, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 43–61 [cit. 8. 8. 2019]. https://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/65823815/choice_of_law_and_intellectual_property_rights.pdf. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-07

Kyselovská, T., Koukal, P. Mezinárodní právo soukromé a právo duševního vlastnictví – kolizní otázky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2019, 388 p.

Kyselovská, T. Působnost práva na internetu. In: Polčák, R. et al. Právo informačních technologií. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2018, pp. 29–64.

Magnus, U. Article 4 Rome I Regulation. In: Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. European Commentaries on Private International Law (ECPIL). Commentary. Vol. II. Rome I Regulation. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 2017, 928 p.

Martiny. In: Hein, J. V. Internationales Privatrecht II: Internationales Wirtschaftsrecht, Einführungsgesetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 50-253). 2018, p. 203.

Rozehnalová, N., Valdhans, J., Drličková, K., Kyselovská, T. Úvod do mezinárodního práva soukromého. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2017, 304 p.

Rozehnalová, N., Valdhans, J., Drličková, K., Kyselovská, T. Mezinárodní právo soukromé Evropské unie. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2018, 392 p. https://doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2019-S-10

The American Law Institute (ALI). Dreyfus, R. et al. Intellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes. Philadelphia: The American Law Institute Publishers, 2008, 219 p.

Thorn, K. Art. 4 Rom I-VO. In: Rauscher, T. Europäisches Zivilprozess- und Kollisionsrecht EuZPR/EuIPR. Kommentar. Band III. Rom I-VO, Rom II-VO. Köln: Otto Schmidt, 2016, 1102 p.

Torremans, P. Licenses and Assignments of Intellectual Property Rights under the Rome I Regulation. Journal of Private International Law. 2008, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17536235.2008.11424345