Abdollahzadeh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of hedging in discussion sections by junior and senior academic writers. Iberica, (38), 177−202. Retrieved from https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/97

Akbas, E., & Hardman, J. (2018). Strengthening or weakening claims in academic knowledge construction: A comparative study of hedges and boosters in postgraduate academic writing. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(4), 831−859. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0260

Almakrob, A. Y. (2020). Native versus nonnative English writers’ use of hedging in linguistics dissertations. Asian EFL Journal, 27(44), 360−381. Retrieved from https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/2020-monthly-editions/volume-27-issue-4-4-october-2020/index.htm

Alotaibi, H. S. (2018). Metadiscourse in dissertation acknowledgments: Exploration of gender differences in EFL texts. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(4), 899−916. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.0247

Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: a corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151−183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055

Can, T., & Cangır, H. (2019). A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100796

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2013). Authorial presence in academic discourse: Functions of author-reference pronouns. Linguistica Pragensia, 1, 9−30. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-af7bd304-5842-4c7c-84f3-0ea122ead518

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O. (2016). Cross-cultural variation in the use of hedges and boosters in academic discourse. Prague Journal of English Studies, 5(1), 163−184. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjes-2016-0009

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O., Adam, M., Povolná, R., & Vogel, R. (2020a). Persuasion in Specialised Discourses. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58163-3

Dontcheva-Navrátilová, O., Jančaříková, R., Hůlková, I., & Schmied, J. (2020b). Theme choices in Czech university students’ English-medium master’s theses. Lingua, 243, 1−17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102892

Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Text, 18(3), pp. 349−382. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133−151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16−29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007

Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997). Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students‘ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 183−205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(97)90033-3

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156−177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156

Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114−124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006

Koutsantoni, D. (2006). Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 19−36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002

Kozubíková Šandová, J. (2020). Cross-cultural differences in the use of rhetorical strategies in academic texts. An English and Czech contrastive study. Linguistica Silesiana, 41, 177−195. https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2017.117053

Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46, 39−54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009

Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interactions in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21−34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004

Mestre-Mestre, E. M. (2017). An analysis of interactive and interactional strategies in conclusions and discussion sections in masters theses. Pragmalinguistica, (25), 416−438. Retrieved from https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/pragma/article/view/3252

Peacock, M. (2008). A cross-disciplinary comparison of boosting in research articles. Corpora, 1(1), 61−84. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2006.1.1.61

Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936

Taymaz, N. (2021). A corpus-based comparison of use of hedges and boosters by Turkish ELT MA and PhD students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17, 33−49. Retrieved from https://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/2083

Wu, B., & Paltridge, B. (2021). Stance expressions in academic writing: A corpus-based comparison of Chinese students’ MA dissertations and PhD theses. Lingua, 253, 1−18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103071