COFOLA International 2022. Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes
KapitolaDigitalisation of Judicial Cooperation in the EU: A Long Road Ahead
Rok vydání: 2022https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0231-2022-13
Abstrakt
This paper aims to highlight the development and pinpoint the issues that arise in the ongoing process of digitalisation of justice in the EU, particularly by analysing the relevant provisions of the new Proposal for a Regulation on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation. Different digital landscapes of the national courts in different Member States will also be showcased so as to detect possible issues in practices with the application of the new Proposal. The paper’s main conclusion is that the Proposal, while a step in the right direction, leaves room for further differentiation of access to justice between Member States. Additional improvements before its adoption are therefore desirable.
Klíčová slova
Digitalisation; e-Justice; European Civil Procedure; Judicial Cooperation in the EU.
Reference
Access to European Union law. EUR-Lex [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
BANICA, R. Digitization of justice in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the implications of digitalization on constitutional rights. Revista de Drept Constitutional. 2020, no. 2, pp. 11–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0001
BODUL, D., NAKIĆ, J. Digitalizacija parničnog postupka (reforma načela ekonomičnosti?). IUS-INFO [online]. 7. 5. 2020 [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.iusinfo.hr/strucni-clanci/CLN20V01D2020B1373
CARBONI, N., VELICOGNA, M. Electronic Data Exchange Within European Justice: e-CODEX Challenges, Threats and Opportunities. International Journal for Court Administration. 2012, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 104–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijca.90
CASHMAN, P. K., GINNIVAN, E. Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions. Macquarie Law Journal. 2019, Vol. 19, pp. 39–79.
CONTINI, F., LANZARA, G. F. The Circulation of Agency in E-Justice: Interoperability and Infrastructures for European Transborder Judicial Proceedings. Berlin: Springer, 2014, 365 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7525-1
Court fees concerning European Payment Order procedure. Italy. European e-Justice [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/305/EN/court_fees_concerning_european_payment_order_procedure?ITALY&member=1#05
Digitalisation of justice. General information. European Commission [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/digitalisation-justice/general-information_en
e-Codex [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.e-codex.eu/
e-Curia. Cour de justice de l’Union européenne [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/P_78957/fr/
e-File. RIK Centre of Registers and Information Systems [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.rik.ee/en/e-file
e-Oglasna ploča sudova. e-Oglasna ploča sudova [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-oglasna.pravosudje.hr/
e-Ovrhe. e-Građani [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-ovrhe.pravosudje.hr/#/home
European e-Justice Portal. European e-Justice [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/home?action=home&plang=en
European payment order. European e-Justice [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/353/EN/european_payment_order?clang=en
KENNETT, W. Civil Enforcement in a Comparative Perspective: A Public Management Challenge. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2021, 635 p.
KOULU, R., PAKASLAHTI, H. Why We Need Legal Technology. In: KOULU, R., HAKKARAINEN, J. (eds.). Law and Digitalisation: Rethinking Legal Services. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Legal Tech Lab Publications, 2018, pp. 17–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31885/2019.00005
KRAMER, X. Access to Justice and Technology: Transforming the Face of Cross-Border Civil Litigation and Adjudication in the EU. In: BENYEKHLEF, K. et al. (eds.). eAccess to Justice. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2016, pp. 351–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2696978
KRAMER, X. Digitising Access to Justice: The Next Steps in the Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation in Europe. Revista General de Derecho Europeo. 2022, Vol. 56, pp. 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4034962
KRAMER, X., GELDER, E. van, THEMELI, E. e-Justice in the Netherlands: The Rocky Road to Digitised Justice. In: WELLER, M., WENDLAND, M. (eds.). Digital Single Market: Bausteine eines Rechts in der Digitalen Welt. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2018, pp. 209–235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3167543
KRUGER, T. The Disorderly Infiltration of EU Law in Civil Procedure. Netherlands International Law Review. 2016, Vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-016-0053-2
LUPO, G., BAILEY, J. Designing and Implementing e-Justice Systems: Some Lessons Learned from EU and Canadian Examples. Laws. 2014, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 353–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3020353
MANNINEN, H. Between Disruption and Regulation – How Do Lawyers Face Digitalisation? In: KOULU, R., HAKKARAINEN, J. (eds.). Law and Digitalisation: Rethinking Legal Services. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Legal Tech Lab Publications, 2018, pp. 83–94.
Online Dispute Resolution. European Commission [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.home2.show
Online processing of cases and e-communication with courts. Germany. European e-Justice [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/280/EN/online_processing_of_cases_and_ecommunication_with_courts?GERMANY&member=1
Online processing of cases and e-communication with courts. Netherlands. European e-Justice [online]. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://e-justice.europa.eu/280/EN/online_processing_of_cases_and_ecommunication_with_courts?NETHERLANDS&member=1
ONTANU, E. A., PANNEBAKKER, E. Tackling Language Obstacles in Cross-Border Litigation: The European Order for Payment and the European Small Claims Procedure Approach. Erasmus Law Review. 2012, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 169–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR221026712012005003004
VELICOGNA, M. Justice Systems and ICT: What can be learned from Europe? Utrecht Law Review. 2007, Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 129–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.41
VELICOGNA, M. In Search of Smartness: The EU e-Justice Challenge. Informatics. 2017, Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics4040038
VELICOGNA, M. et al. Connecting EU Jurisdictions: Exploring How to Open Justice Across Member States Through ICT. Social Science Computer Review. 2018, Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 274–294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318786949
VIDAS, I. Novine koje donosi prijedlog Pravilnika o izmjenama i dopunama Pravilnika o radu u sustavu eSpis. IUS-INFO [online]. 21. 12. 2021 [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.iusinfo.hr/aktualno/u-sredistu/48766