COFOLA International 2022. Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes
KapitolaCurrent Challenges of Enforcing Annulled Arbitral Awards
Rok vydání: 2022https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0231-2022-11
Abstrakt
The controversy regarding the French approach to the enforcement of annulled arbitral awards may have died out, yet new issues continue to arise. This paper analyses the current practice in respect to the discretion given to the enforcing courts by the New York Convention. Special attention is paid to the development of case law and approaches of leading jurisdictions concerning the relationship of an award with the legal order under which it was rendered. The purpose of this paper is assessment of the discretion granted to the national courts by Article V of the New York Convention to enforce an award notwithstanding its annulment at the seat.
Klíčová slova
Annulment Proceedings; Discretionary Power; International Arbitration; New York Convention; Public Policy.
Reference
BERG, A. J. van den. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia – Case Comment on Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, April 28, 2009. Journal of International Arbitration. 2010, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 179–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2010010
BERG, A. J. van den. Netherlands No. 41, Nikolai Viktorovich Maximov v. OJSC Novolipetsky Metallurgichesky Kombinat, Provisions Judge of the District Court of Amsterdam, 491569/KG RK 11-1722, 17 November 2011. In: Yearbook Commercial Arbitration Vol. XXXVIII. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013, pp. 274–276.
BIRD, R. C. Enforcement of Annulled Arbitration Awards: A Company Perspective and an Evaluation of a New York Convention. North Carolina Journal of International Law & Commercial Regulation. 2011, Vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1013–1058.
BORN, G. B. The New York Convention: A Self-Executing Treaty. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2018, Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 115–187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36642/mjil.40.1.new
CORREIA FILHO, A. C. N. The Theories of International Arbitration and Related Practical Issues: The Brazilian Approach (Particularly the Recent Leading Case on Recognition of Annulled Awards) vis-à-vis the Delocalization Trend. Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem. 2016, Vol. 13, no. 52, pp. 26–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/RBA2016051
DEVENISH, P. Enforcement in England and Wales of Arbitral Awards Set Aside in Their Country of Origin. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal. 2018, Vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 143–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2018.1507809
DOBIÁŠ, P. The Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin. In: BĚLOHLÁVEK, A. J., ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. (eds.). Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. Vol. 9. The Hague: Lex Lata, 2019, pp. 3–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3408735
DUNNA, G. T. To Enforce or Not to Enforce: Laying a Standard of Enforcement of Annulled Awards in India. Indian Review of International Arbitration. 2021, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 114–141.
HORVATH, G. J. What Weight Should be Given to the Annulment of an Award under the Lex Arbitri? The Austrian and German Perspectives. Journal of International Arbitration. 2009, Vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 249–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2009013
JUNITA, F. ‘Pro Enforcement Bias’ under Article V of the New York Convention in International Commercial Arbitration: Comparative Overview. Indonesian Law Review. 2015, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 140–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v5n2.150
KERAMEUS, K. D. Waiver of Setting-Aside Procedures in International Arbitration. The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1993, Vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 73–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/840507
MOSES, M. L. The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 340 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819216
MOURA VICENTE, D. Requirements for the Enforceability of Arbitral Awards: A Comparative Overview. APA – Associação Portuguesa de Arbitragem [online]. 2019, 23 p. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.arbitragem.pt/xms/files/Estudos_da_APA/requirements-enforceability-arbitral-awards-dario-moura-vicente.pdf
NACIMIENTO, P., BARNASHOV, A. Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Russia. Journal of International Arbitration. 2010, Vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 295–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2010016
PETROCHILOS, G. C. Enforcing Awards Annulled in Their State of Origin Under the New York Convention. International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 1999, Vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 856–888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300063715
RAU, A. S. Understanding (and Misunderstanding) ‘Primary Jurisdiction’. American Review of International Arbitration [online]. 2010, no. 06-10, pp. 1–118 [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1633555
SILBERMAN, L., HESS, R. U. Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Set Aside or Annulled at the Seat of Arbitration. Cambridge Compedium of International Commercial and Investment Arbitration [online]. 2022, 35 p. [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4029102
SILBERMAN, L. The New York Convention After Fifty Years: Some Reflections on the Role of National Law. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law. 2009, Vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 25–46.
TWEEDDALE, K., TWEEDDALE, A. Cutting the Gordian Knot: Enforcing Awards where an Application Has Been Made to Set Aside the Award at the Seat of the Arbitration. Arbitration: The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management. 2015, Vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 137–149.