COFOLA International 2022. Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes

Kapitola

Abstrakt

For decades, the general attitude has been moving towards accepting contract adjustment in arbitration. More and more, the question is when and how a contract may be adjusted and not whether the arbitrators may have such a power. The article will firstly discuss hardship as a basis for contract adjustment and provide general discussion on arbitrators’ position in cases of hardship. Once the scene is set the paper will focus on how the issue is approached in the area of long-term gas sale and purchase agreements and especially the price review clauses. Based on their example, it is concluded that arbitral tribunals should evaluate not only conditions of hardship but also the will of the parties to continue the contract and, in absence of any other guidance, request proposals for adjustment from the parties.

Klíčová slova

Contract Adjustment; Hardship Clause; Price-Review Clause; Gas Sale and Purchase Agreements.


Reference

BEISTEINER, L. Chapter I: The Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability, The (Perceived) Power of the Arbitrator to Revise a Contract – The Austrian Perspective. In: KLAUSEGGER, C. et al. (eds.). Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2014. Wien: C. H. Beck, 2014, pp. 77–122.

BERGER, K. P. Power of Arbitrators to Fill Gaps and Revise Contracts to Make Sense. Arbitration International. 2001, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008903610076

BERGER, K. P. Adaptation of Long-Term Contracts by International Arbitrators in the Face of Severe Economic Disruptions: Three Salient Problems. Journal of International Arbitration. 2020, Vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 589–606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2020028

BRUNNER, C. Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-performance in International Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009, 589 p.

COHEN, G. Long-Term Gas Contracting: Terms, definitions, pricing – Theory and practice. Institute of Energy for SE Europe (IENE) [online]. 2019 [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://www.iene.eu/articlefiles/Long-Term%20Gas.pdf

DAWWAS, A. Alteration of the Contractual Equilibrium Under the UNIDROIT Principles. Pace International Law Review Online Companion. 2010, Vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1–28.

Final Award in Case 15610. ICC Bulletin e-Chapter, Extracts from ICC Arbitration in Oil and Gas Disputes. 2014, Vol. 25, no. 1.

FERRARIO, P. The Adaptation of Long-Term Gas Sale Agreements by Arbitrators. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2017, 212 p.

FONTAINE, M. Chapter 1: The Evolution of the Rules on Hardship. In: BORTOLOTTI, F., UFOT, D. (eds.). Hardship and Force Majeure in International Commercial Contracts: Dealing with Unforeseen Events in a Changing World. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 2019, pp. 11–40.

HILLMAN, R. A. Court Adjustment of Long-Term Contracts: An Analysis Under Modern Contract Law. Duke Law Journal. 1987, Vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1372502

HORN, N. Changes in Circumstances and the Revision of Contracts in Some European Laws and in International Law. In: HORN, N. (ed.). Adaptation and Renegotiation of Contracts in International Trade and Finance. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law International, 1985, pp. 15–29.

ICC Force Majeure and Hardship Clauses. ICC [online]. [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2020/03/icc-forcemajeure-hardship-clauses-march2020.pdf

IYNEDJIAN, M. Gas Sale and Purchase Agreements under Swiss Law. ASA Bulletin. 2012, Vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 746–757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/ASAB2012067

KAUFMAN, E. E., SVINKOVSKAYA, S. Chapter 5: Gas and Liquefied Natural Gas Disputes in Latin America: Issues of Force Majeure, Hardship, and Price Reopeners. In: ALVAREZ, G. M., PICHÉ, M. R., SPERANDIO, F. V. (eds.). International Arbitration in Latin America: Energy and Natural Resources Disputes. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law International, 2021, pp. 119–138.

KHANNA, K. Gas Price Review Disputes: Key Insights for a Successful Resolution. Global Arbitration Review [online]. 10. 11. 2020 [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-energy-arbitrations/4th-edition/article/gas-price-review-disputes-key-insights-successful-resolution

LOREFICE, M. Gas Price Review Arbitrations. Global Arbitration Review [online]. 10. 11. 2020 [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/guide/the-guide-energy-arbitrations/​4th-edition/article/gas-price-review-arbitrations

LORFING, P. A. Chapter 2: Adaptation of Contracts by Arbitrators. In: BORTOLOTTI, F., UFOT, D. (eds.). Hardship and Force Majeure in International Commercial Contracts: Dealing with Unforeseen Events in a Changing World. Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 2019, pp. 41–81.

Partial 10351. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin. 2009, Vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 76–86.

POLKINGHORNE, M. A. Take-or-Pay Conditions in Gas Supply Agreements. White & Case LLP [online]. 2016 [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/paris-energy-series-no7_2016.pdf

ROSENGREN, J. Contract Interpretation in International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration. 2013, Vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2013001

ROZEHNALOVÁ, N. Vyšší moc, hardship aneb smluvní doložky v mezinárodní praxi. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. 2015, Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 57–64.

SARZANA, S. The rise of price revision arbitrations. ICLG [online]. 31. 10. 2012 [cit. 12. 6. 2022]. Available at: https://iclg.com/cdr/arbitration-and-adr/european-energy-disputes:​-the-rise-of-price​-revision-arbitrations

SCHWENZER, I., MUÑOZ, E. Duty to renegotiate and contract adaptation in case of hardship. Uniform Law Review. 2019, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 149–174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unz009

ZIADÉ, R., PLUMP, A. Changed Circumstances and Oil and Gas Contracts. BCDR International Arbitration Review. 2020, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 193–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/BCDR2021022