COFOLA International 2022. Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes
KapitolaNew Practices in Alternative Dispute Resolution – New Pathways to Peace
Rok vydání: 2022https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0231-2022-2
Abstrakt
This paper seeks to answer the question of how the pandemic has given rise to new solutions in the field of alternative dispute resolution. It examines the legislative processes these solutions have generated and, looking ahead, asks whether these legislative solutions can be expected to remain timeless or even evolve. Unfortunately, the examination of this question has also become topical, as humanity, which has been locked in a pandemic, is once again facing serious isolation due to the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The global loss of confidence, which is dramatically accelerating in a war situation, is a further serious challenge compared to the pandemic experience. What role can alternative dispute resolution play in this situation? Are the technological changes imposed by the pandemic useful for alternative dispute resolution?
Klíčová slova
Alternative Dispute Resolution; Loss of Trust; Online Dispute Resolution; Pandemic; War Conflict.
Reference
ARINZE-UMOBI, C. N., OKONKWO, I. T. Alternative Dispute Resolution Practice in Nigeria and the Effect of Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Law and Clinical Legal Education [online]. 2021, Vol. 2, pp. 82–85 [cit. 29. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.nigerianjournalsonline.com/index.php/IJOLACLE/article/view/1717
Australia Wants AI to Handle Divorces – Here’s Why. The Nextweb [online]. 10. 10. 2020 [cit. 27. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://thenextweb.com/neural/2020/10/10/australia-wants-ai-to-handle-divorces-heres-why-syndication/
BARCY, M. Konfliktusok és előítéletek. A vonzások és taszítások világa [Conflicts and prejudices. The world of attractions and repulsions]. Budapest: Oriold és Társai Kiadó és Szolgáltató Kft., 2012, 212 p.
BARCZY, M. and E. SZAMOS. “Mediare necesse est”. A mediáció technikái és társadalmi alkalmazása [“Mediare necesse est”. Mediation techniques and their social application]. Budapest: Animula, 2002, 108 p.
BUTLER-BOWDON, T. Pszichológia dióhéjban [Psychology in a nutshell]. Budapest: HVG Kiadó Zrt., 2007, 544 p.
BUTLER, S. et al. The Utah Online Dispute Resolution Platform: A Usability Evaluation and Report. The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law [online]. 8. 9. 2020, 188 p. [cit. 27. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://law.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/i4J_Utah_ODR_Report.pdf
Digital solutions during the pandemic. European Commission [online]. [cit. 29. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/live-work-travel-eu/coronavirus-response/digital-solutions-during-pandemic_en
EU response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. European Council [online]. [cit. 27. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/hu/policies/eu-response-ukraine-invasion/
FAVALORO, G. J. A mediáció mint családterápiás módszer? [Mediation as a family therapy method?]. In: KERTÉSZ, T. (ed.). Mediációs szöveggyűjtemény [Collection of mediation texts]. Budapest: Partners Hungary Alapítvány, 2001, pp. 142–150.
Functioning of the European ODR Platform. Statistical report 2020. European Commission [online]. December 2021, 4 p. [cit. 30. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/2021-report-final.pdf
GHOZALI, M., ISPRIYARSO, B. The Online Arbitration in E-Commerce Dispute Resolution During Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Daulat Hukum [online]. 2021, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 157–170 [cit. 25. 4. 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v4i3.16266. Available at: http://lppm-unissula.com/jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/RH/article/viewFile/16266/5686
GRÁNER, Zs. Az alternatív vitarendezés lehetséges útjai a polgári-gazdasági jogviták tekintetében, fókuszban a választottbíráskodással [Possible avenues for alternative dispute resolution in civil and economic disputes, with a focus on arbitration]. Székesfehérvári Törvényszék [online]. 2020, 40 p. [cit. 17. 3. 2022]. Available at: https://szekesfehervaritorvenyszek.birosag.hu/sites/default/files/news/az_alternativ_vitarendezes_lehetseges_utjai.pdf
ISSA, G., WALDERSEE, V. ‘Home nesting’ and telehealth spending to keep rising post-pandemic, McKinsey survey finds. Reuters [online]. 18. 3. 2021 [cit. 26. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-consumer-idUSKBN2BA0FR
JENEI, Á. A “Nehéz” ügyfelek kezelése [Dealing with difficult customers]. In: JENEI, Á. (ed.). Ügyfélszolgálati készségfejlesztés. Tréning háttéranyag. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, 2017, 60 p. Available at: https://nkerepo.uni-nke.hu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/6852/%DCgyf%E9lszolg%E1lati%20k%E9szs%E9gfejleszt%E9s.pdf;jsessionid=4AA195D85D3BF057966DDF4B62020EA3?sequence=1 [cit. 16. 2. 2022].
KERTÉSZ, T. Mediáció a gyakorlatban [Mediation in practice]. Miskolc: Bíbor, 2010, 261 p.
KOMLÓSI, P., ANTAL, O. Válni? Miért? Hogyan? [A divorce? Why? How?]. Glossa Iuridica. 2016, Vol. 3, no. 3–4, pp. 87–103.
LOVAS, Zs., HERCZOG, M. Mediáció, avagy a fájdalommentes konfliktuskezelés [Mediation, or painless conflict management]. Budapest: Wolters Kluwer, 2019, 208 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55413/9789632959337
MILASSIN, L. Fogyasztóvédelem és az online vitamegoldó eljárás [Consumer protection and the online dispute resolution process]. Iustum Aequum Salutare [online]. 2014, Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 95–104 [cit. 1. 2. 2022]. Available at: https://epa.oszk.hu/02400/02445/00032/pdf/EPA02445_ias_2014_02_095-104.pdf
OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report: Economic and Social Impacts and Policy Implications of the War in Ukraine. OECD [online]. March 2022, 16 p. [cit. 27. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/economy/Interim-economic-outlook-report-march-2022.pdf
OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). International trade during the COVID-19 pandemic: Big shifts and uncertainty. OECD [online]. 10. 3. 2022 [cit. 25. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/international-trade-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-big-shifts-and-uncertainty-d1131663/
Online Dispute Resolution. European Commission [online]. [cit. 20. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/odr/main/?event=main.home.howitworks
PAJOR, G. Működőképes az üzleti stratégiád a digitális világban? Mit jelent a diszruptív technológia? És mi köze a digitális átalakuláshoz [Is your business strategy viable in the digital world? What does disruptive technology mean? And what it has to do with digital transformation]. BITPORT [online]. 10. 7. 2015 [cit. 20. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://bitport.hu/mukodokepes-az-uzleti-strategiad-a-digitalis-vilagban.html
PALLAI, K. Vitarendezés és konfliktuskezelés – jegyzet/gyakorlati segédlet [Dispute and conflict management – note/practical guide]. Pallai [online]. 2011, 70 p. [cit. 17. 3. 2022]. Available at: http://www.pallai.hu/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/2011-Pallai-vitarendez%C3%A9s-jegyzet-BCE.pdf
POKOL, B. A jog elkerülésének útjai. Mediáció, egyezségkötés [Ways to avoid the law. Mediation, conciliation]. Jogelméleti Szemle [online]. 2002, no. 1 [cit. 3. 1. 2022]. Available at: http://jesz.ajk.elte.hu/pokol9.html
SHAYDULLINA, V. K. Online Arbitration Model for Russia Based on International Practice of Dispute Resolution in E-commerce. Revista Inclusiones [online]. 2020, Vol. 7, pp. 198–214 [cit. 29. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://revistainclusiones.org/pdf14/12%20VOL%207%20NUM%20Universidad.pdf
SMITH, E. R., MACKIE, D. M., CLAYPOOL, H. M. Szociálpszichológia [Social psychology]. Budapest: Eötvös Kiadó, 2016, 873 p.
SOURDIN, T., ZELEZNIKOW, J. Courts, Mediation and COVID-19. SSRN [online]. 8. 5. 2020, 32 p. [cit. 29. 9. 2022]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595910
SOURDIN, T., LI, B., McNAMARA, D. M. Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology [online]. 2020, Vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 447–453 [cit. 29. 9. 2022]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7456584/#bib0018
STRASSER, F. and P. RANDOLPH. Mediáció: a konfliktusmegoldás lélektani aspektusai [Mediation: A Psychological Insight into Conflict Resolution]. Budapest: Nyitott Könyvműhely Kiadó, 2005, 205 p.
ZIMBARDO, P., JOHNSON, R., McCANN, V. Pszichológia mindenkinek – Motiváció, érzelmek, személyiség, közösség [Psychology for all – Motivation, emotions, personality, community]. Budapest: Libri Kiadó, 2018, 263 p.
ZŐDI, Zs. A járvány, a jogi szféra és a technológia. Hogyan vészelték át a jogrendszerek a járványt, mekkora szerepe volt ebben a technológiának, és mennyire lesznek tartósak a változások? [The epidemic, the legal sphere and technology. How have legal systems weathered the epidemic, how much has technology played a role and how long will the changes last?]. In Medias Res [online]. 2020, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 339–355 [cit. 20. 9. 2022]. Available at: http://real.mtak.hu/126123/1/imr-2020-02-09.pdf