COFOLA International 2022. Current Challenges of Resolution of International (Cross-Border) Disputes
KapitolaBridging the Public-Private Law Divide in the Conflict of Laws
Rok vydání: 2022https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P280-0231-2022-1
Abstrakt
As the name suggests, the methodology of private international law relates to substantive private law only. A parallel methodological system regarding public law does not exist. The paper argues that this methodological rift lacks any doctrinal justification. It concludes that there are no obstacles to all-sided conflict of laws rules in the public law domain. Since the paper finds that foreign public law is already applicable in private party cases (albeit heavily obscured), it focuses on public law relationships where a foreign state appears as a plaintiff. In this respect, it is shown why the application of foreign public law embodies an attractive compromise between legal assistance and recognition.
Klíčová slova
Foreign Public Law; Public Law Taboo; Foreign State as a Party; Conflict of Laws; Private International Law.
Reference
BAADE, H. W. The Operation of Foreign Public Law. Texas International Law Journal. 1995, Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 429–498.
BAKER, P. Changing the Norm on Cross-border Enforcement of Tax Debts. Intertax. 2002, Vol. 30, no. 6–7, pp. 216–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/5090049
BAR, C. von, MANKOWSKI, P. Internationales Privatrecht. Band I. Allgemeine Lehren. München: C. H. Beck, 2003, 745 p.
DICEY, A., COLLINS, L., MORRIS, J. Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws. 15. ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2012, 2385 p.
ELLIOT, M., FELDMAN, D. Introduction. In: ELLIOT, M. et al. (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Public Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139342551.001
FEDOZZI, P. De l’efficacité extra-territoriale des lois et des actes de droit public. In: Recueil des Cours 1929. The Hague: Brill Nijhoff, 1930, Vol. 27, pp. 145–241.
HANDRLICA, J. A Treatise for International Administrative Law, Part II: On Overgrown Paths. The Lawyer Quarterly. 2021, Vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 178–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2021/11/3.06
HANDRLICA, J. Foreign Law as Applied by Administrative Authorities: Grenznormen Revisited. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu. 2018, Vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 193–215.
HANDRLICA, J. Is There an EU International Administrative Law? A Juristic Delusion Revisited. European Journal of Legal Studies. 2020, Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 79–116.
HEMLER, A. Die Methodik der Eingriffsnorm im modernen Kollisionsrecht. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019, 315 p.
HEMLER, A. Virtuelle Verfahrensteilnahme aus dem Ausland und Souveränität des fremden Aufenthaltsstaats. The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law. 2022, Vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 905–934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/rabelsz-2022-0081
JENNINGS, R., WATTS, A. Oppenheim’s International Law, Volume 1 Peace. 9. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 2887 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780582302457.001.0001
KAHN, F. Gesetzeskollisionen. Jherings Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts. 1891, Vol. 30, pp. 1–143.
KAHN, F. Über Inhalt, Natur und Methode des Internationalen Privatrechts. Jherings Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts. 1898, Vol. 40, pp. 1–87.
LOWENFELD, F. A. Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law, and Some Suggestions for Their Interaction. In: Recueil des Cours 1979. The Hague: Brill Nijhoff, 1980, Vol. 163, pp. 311–448.
MANN, F. A. Further Studies in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990, 400 p.
MANN, F. A. Statutes and the Conflict of Laws. In: WALDOCK, H., JENNINS, R. Y. (eds.). British Yearbook of International Law. 1972–1973, Vol. 46. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975, pp. 117–144.
NEUMEYER, K. Internationales Verwaltungsrecht. Zürich: Verlag für Recht und Gesellschaft, 1936, 600 p.
SAVIGNY, F. C. von. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Achter Band. Berlin: Veit & Comp., 1849, 540 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111573007
SCHINKELS, B. Normsatzstruktur des IPR. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007, 268 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-151201-8
SCHURIG, K. Kollisionsnorm und Sachrecht. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1981, 393 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-44825-8
SIEHR, K. Commercial Transactions and the Forfeiture of State Immunity Under Private International Law. Art Antiquity and Law. 2008, Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 339–349.
SIEHR, K. Private International Law and the Difficult Problem to Return Illegally Exported Cultural Property. Uniform Law Review. 2015, Vol. 20, pp. 503–515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unv033
TEO, M. Public Law Adjudication, International Uniformity and the Foreign Act of State Doctrine. Journal of Private International Law. 2020, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 361–389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2020.1846257
The Schengen acquis. Official Journal of the European Union [online]. 22. 9. 2000 [cit. 30. 5. 2022]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L:2000:239:FULL&from=EN
TORREMANS, P., HEINZE, C., GRUŠIĆ, U. Cheshire, North & Fawcett: Private International Law. 15. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 1584 p.
TRUTMANN, V. Kollisionsnormen im Schweizerischen Sozialversicherungsrecht. In: MEIER, I., SIEHR, K. (eds.). Rechtskollisionen: Festschrift für Anton Heini zum 65. Geburtstag. Zürich: Schulthess, 1995, 564 p.
VOGEL, K. Der räumliche Anwendungsbereich der Verwaltungsrechtsnorm. Frankfurt am Main: Metzner, 1965, 480 p.