Cofola International 2021. International and National Arbitration – Challenges and Trends of the Present and Future
KapitolaSources of Transnational Public Policy in International Commercial Arbitration
Rok vydání: 2021https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8639-2021-11
Abstrakt
The paper deals with transnational public policy in international commercial arbitration. Firstly, the distinction between national and international public policy and the application of these types of public policy in arbitration are presented. Secondly, a characterization of transnational public policy is given so that the paper can discuss the question – what are the sources of transnational public policy. In the last part, the application of transnational public policy is then inferred from the existence of international conventions, from the lex mercatoria and from deciding as amiable compositeur.
Klíčová slova
Transnational Public Policy; National Public Policy; International Public Policy; International Commercial Arbitration; International Conventions; Lex Mercatoria; Amiable Compositeur.
Reference
BATIFFOL, H. Droit international privé. Paris: Libraire générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 1970, 459 p.
BĚLOHLÁVEK, A. J. Evropské a mezinárodní insolvenční řízení. Komentář k Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) č. 2015/848 o insolvenčním řízení. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2020, 1568 p.
BĚLOHLÁVEK, A. J. Rozhodčí řízení, ordre public a trestní právo. Komentář. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2008, 1276 p.
BOGDAN, M. Private International Law as Component of the Law of the Forum. General Course on Private International Law. In: Recueil des cours 2010. Leiden: Brill – Nijhoff Publishers, 2011, Vol. 348, pp. 9–252. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004226357
BONOMI, A. Chapter 13: The Concept of Public Policy under the 1958 New York Convention: An Autonomous Interpretation? In: FERRARI, F. and F. ROSENFELD (eds.). Autonomous versus domestic concepts under the New York Convention. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2021, pp. 315–347.
BRABANDERE, E. de. The (Ir)relevance of Transnational Public Policy in Investment Treaty Arbitration – A Reply to Jean-Michel Marcoux. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2020, Vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 847–866. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340196
BREKOULAKIS, S. Transnational Public Policy in International Arbitration. In: SCHULTZ, T. and F. ORTINO (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, pp. 121–150. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0005
CLAVEL, S. Droit international privé. Paris: Dalloz, 2018, 744 p.
Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriage by Air Signed at Warsaw on 12 October 1929 and the Protocol Modifying the Said Convention Signed at the Hague on 28 September 1955. International Civil Aviation Organization [online]. [cit. 30. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://www.icao.int/secretariat/legal/List%20of%20Parties/WC-HP_EN.pdf
Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air Done at Montreal on 28 May 1999. International Civil Aviation Organization [online]. [cit. 30. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://www.icao.int/secretariat/legal/List%20of%20Parties/Mtl99_EN.pdf
DRLIČKOVÁ, K. Vliv legis arbitrii na uznání a výkon cizího rozhodčího nálezu. Brno: Masaryk University, 2013, 204 p.
FADLALLAH, I. L’ordre public dans les sentences arbitrales. In: Recueil des cours 1994, Leiden: Brill – Nijhoff Publishers, 1996, Vol. 249, pp. 369–430.
FAZILATFAR, H. Transnational Public Policy: Does It Function from Arbitrability to Enforcement. City University of Hong Kong Law Review, 2012, Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 286–314.
FERIS, J. and S. TORKOMYAN. Impact of Parallel Criminal Proceedings on Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration: Selected ICC Cases. ICC Dispute Resolution Bulletin [online]. 2019, no. 3 [cit. 12. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://library.iccwbo.org/
GRODL, L. Transnacionalismus v lex mercatoria a jeho projevy v soudobé rozhodčí praxi. Rigorous thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, 2021, 114 p.
Guide on the Convention on the (New York, 1958). UNCITRAL Secretariat [online]. 2016, 336 p. [cit. 11. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://newyorkconvention1958.org/pdf/guide/2016_Guide_on_the_NY_Convention.pdf#page=251
GUILLAUMÉ, J. Le droit international privé en tableaux. Paris: Ellipses, 2017, 480 p.
GUILLAUMÉ, J. Ordre public international – Notion d´ordre public international. JurisClasseur Droit international, 2018, fasc. 534-10, 52 p.
KIFFER, L. Nature and Content of Amiable Composition. International Business Law Journal, 2008, no. 5, pp. 625–634.
KOSSUTH, L. Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration. In: SANDERS, P. (ed.). Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration. ICCA Congress Series. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 1987, pp. 258–318.
KREINDLER, R. H. Approaches to the Application of Transnational Public Policy by Arbitrators. Journal of World Investment & Trade, 2003, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 239–250. DOI https://doi.org/10.1163/221190003X00354
LALIVE, P. Ordre public transnational (ou réellement international) et arbitrage international. Revue de l’Arbitrage, 1986, no. 3, pp. 329–374.
LANDO, O. The Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1985, Vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 747–768. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/34.4.747
MAYER, P. Chapter 2: Effect of International Public Policy in International Arbitration. In: LEW, J. D. M. and L. A. MISTELIS (eds.). Pervasive Problems in International Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2006, pp. 61–69.
MAYER, P. Mandatory rules of law in international arbitration. Arbitration International, 1986, Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 274–293. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.4.274
PRYLES, M. Reflections on Transnational Public Policy. Journal of International Arbitration, 2007, Vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–8.
RENNER, M. Towards a Hierarchy of Norms in Transnational Law? Journal of International Arbitration, 2009, Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 533–555.
ROZEHNALOVÁ, N., J. VALDHANS and T. KYSELOVSKÁ. Právo mezinárodního obchodu včetně problematiky mezinárodního rozhodčího řízení. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2021, 524 p.
SEELIG, M. L. The Notion of Transnational Public Policy and Its Impact on Jurisdiction, Arbitrability and Admissibility. Annals FLB – Belgrade Law Review, 2009, Vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 116–134.
Status: United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Vienna, 1980) (CISG). United Nations [online]. [cit. 30. 8. 2021]. Available at: https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg/status
TERAMURA, N. Ex Aequo et Bono as a Response to the ‘Over-Judicialisation’ of International Commercial Arbitration. Doctoral thesis. UNSW Australia, Faculty of Law, 2018, 252 p.
TICHÝ, L. CISG (Úmluva OSN o smlouvách o mezinárodní koupi zboží). Praha: C. H. Beck, 2017, 416 p.
TRAKMAN, L. E. Aligning State Sovereignty with Transnational Public Policy. Tulane Law Review, 2018, Vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 207–268. DOI https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3301024