Cofola International 2021. International and National Arbitration – Challenges and Trends of the Present and Future
Kapitola(Artificially) Intelligent Arbitration – The Ambitions and Limitations of Decision-making
Rok vydání: 2021https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-8639-2021-3
Abstrakt
The digital revolution of the 20th century made information available everywhere and anytime. Now in the age of Artificial Intelligence, this information is used for automating the decision-making process in the hope of a better and improved future. Bearing all the positives in our minds, we simply cannot forget about the concerns that artificial intelligence will have on dispute resolution. For these reasons, this article aims to analyze the use of artificial intelligence in the process of arbitrary decision-making. Exploring the technical aspects as well as the theoretical implications for decision-making.
Klíčová slova
Arbitration; Artificial Intelligence; Decision-making.
Reference
ABDEL WAHAB, M. S. ODR and e-Abritation – Trends & Challenges. Mediate.com [online]. May 2013 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://www.mediate.com/pdf/wahabearb.pdf
ALETRAS, N. et al. Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science [online]. 24. 10. 2016 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. DOI https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93. Available at: https://peerj.com/articles/cs-93/
BLACK, J. Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a ‘Post-Regulatory’ World. Current Legal Problems [online]. 2001, Vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 103–146 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/54.1.103. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30527050_Decentring_Regulation_Understanding_the_Role_of_Regulation_and_Self-Regulation_in_a_%27Post-Regulatory%27_World
BOSTROM, N. and E. YUDKOWSKY. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (Draft for Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence). Nickbostrom.com [online]. 2011 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://faculty.smcm.edu/acjamieson/s13/artificialintelligence.pdf
CAGE, D. Big Data Uncovers Some Weird Correlations. The Wall Street Journal [online]. 23. 3. 2014 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303369904579423132072969654
CARRARA, C. The Impact of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence on Arbitral Proceedings – Ethical Issues. In: KLAUSEGGER, C. et al. (eds.). Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration 2020. Wien: C. H. Beck, 2020, pp. 513–530.
CHAKRABORTY, A. and A. CHAKRABORTY. Rethinking the Practicalities of Arbitration in the Age of a Pandemic. SSRN [online]. 18. 5. 2020 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3628923
CORRALES, M., M. FENWICK and N. FORGO (eds.). Robotics, AI and the Future of Law (Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation). Singapore: Springer, 2018, 358 p. DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2874-9
DOBREV, D. A. Definition of Artificial Intelligence. Mathematica Balkanica [online]. 2005, New Series, Vol. 19, pp. 67–74 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://www.math.bas.bg/infres/MathBalk/MB-19/MB-19-067-073.pdf
EPSTEIN, D. Rationality, Legitimacy, & The Law. Washington University Jurisprudence Review [online]. 2014, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–38 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1103&context=law_jurisprudence
GORRY, A. and M. MORTON. A Framework for Management Information Systems [online]. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1971, 33 p. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/47936/frameworkformana00gorr.pdf
Guidelines on Automated individual decision-making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679 (wp251rev.01) adopted on 3 October 2017. European Commission [online]. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/items/612053
GUIMERA, R. and M. PARDO. Justice Blocks and Predictability of U.S. Supreme Court Votes. PLOS ONE [online]. 9. 11. 2011 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027188. Available at: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0027188
GYARFÁŠ, F. et al. Zákon o rozhodcovskom konaní. Komentár. Bratislava: C. H. Beck, 2016, 744 p.
GYURÁSZ, Z. Problematika “telo – myseľ ” v 21. storočí (dôležitosť filozofie mysle pre modernú podobu umelej inteligencie). COMENIUS časopis [online]. 2021, no. 1, pp. 16–26 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://comeniuscasopis.flaw.uniba.sk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Comenius_1_2021_fin-3.pdf
GYURÁSZ, Z. and M. MESARČÍK. Nové technológie a regulačné výzvy. In: ANDRAŠKO, J. et al. Právo informačných a komunikačných technológií (2. díl). Bratislava: TINCT, 2021, 328 p.
HALLA, S. Arbitration Going Online – New Challenges in 21st Century? Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology [online]. 2011, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 215–225 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://journals.muni.cz/mujlt/article/view/2583/2147
HARRIS, J. and T. DAVENPORT. Automated Decision Making Comes of Age. MIT Sloan Management Review [online]. 15. 7. 2005 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/automated-decision-making-comes-of-age/
HOLMES, O. W. The Common Law. Mineola: Dover Publications, 1991, 480 p.
ICC Commission Report on Information Technology in International Arbitration 2017. International Chamber of Commerce [online]. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://iccwbo.org/content/uploads/sites/3/2017/03/icc-information-technology-in-international-arbitration-icc-arbitration-adr-commission.pdf
KADIOGLU, C. and S. HABIB. Virtual Hearings to the Rescue: Let’s Pause for the Seat? Kluwer Arbitration Blog [online]. 13. 7. 2020 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/07/13/virtual-hearings-to-the-rescue-lets-pause-for-the-seat/
KOK, J. et al. Artificial intelligence: Definition, Trends, Techniques and Cases. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) [online]. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c15/e6-44.pdf
LYSINA, P., M. ĎURIŠ and M. HAŤAPKA. Medzinárodné právo súkromné. Bratislava: C. H. Beck, 2016, 544 p.
LYSINA, P. Právny štát ako spoločná hodnota členských štátov európskej únie? In: Bratislava Legal Forum 2020. Bratislava: Comenius University, Faculty of Law, 2020, pp. 38–47.
MACCORMICK, N. Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010, 304 p.
MARQUEZ, A. S. Can Artificial Intelligence be used to appoint arbitrators? Practical and legal implications of the use of Artificial Intelligence in the appointment of arbitrators in International Commercial Arbitration. AVANI [online]. 2020, no. 1, pp. 249–272 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://avarbitraje.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/ANAVI-No1-A12-pp-249-272.pdf
MARROW, P. B., K. MANSI and S. KUYAN. Artificial Intelligence and Arbitration: The Computer as an Arbitrator – Are We There Yet? Dispute Resolution Journal [online]. 2020, Vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 35–76 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3709032
MCFADDEN, J. Integrating information in the brain’s EM field: the cemi field theory of consciousness. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2020, Vol. 2020, no. 1, pp. 1–13. DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niaa016
MESARČÍK, M. and Z. GYURÁSZ. Umelá inteligencia a právna úprava zdravotníctva v Slovenskej republike. Bratislava: Právnická fakulta, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, 2020, 99 p.
MESARČÍK, M. Policajné profilovanie v kontexte základných ľudských práv a slobôd. Acta Facultatis Iuridicae Universitatis Comenianae, 2019, Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 178–226.
Process Concerns. Kluwer Arbitration Blog [online]. 24. 10. 2020 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/10/24/in-a-first-worldwide-austrian-supreme-court-confirms-arbitral-tribunals-power-to-hold-remote-hearings-over-one-partys-objection-and-rejects-due-process-concerns/
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts 2021. EUR-Lex [online]. 21. 4. 2021 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1623335154975&uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206
RUGER, T. et al. The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision making. Columbia Law Review [online]. 2004, Vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1150–1210 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/4099370. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4099370?seq=1
Rules of Arbitration and Mediation 2018 (Vienna Rules and Vienna Mediation Rules 2018). VIAC [online]. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://www.viac.eu/en/arbitration/content/vienna-rules-2018-online
SATTAR, S. Enforcement of arbitral award and public policy: same concept, different approach? Employment Law Alliance [online]. [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://www.ela.law/Templates/media/files/Misc%20Documents/Enforcement-of-Arbitral-Awards-Public-Policy.pdf
SCHERER, M. et al. In a ‘First’ Worldwide, Austrian Supreme Court Confirms Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Hold Remote Hearings Over One Party’s Objection and Rejects Due Process Concerns. Kluwer Arbitration Blog [online]. 24. 10. 2020 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/10/24/in-a-first-worldwide-austrian-supreme-court-confirms-arbitral-tribunals-power-to-hold-remote-hearings-over-one-partys-objection-and-rejects-due-process-concerns/
SIAC Guides on Taking Your Arbitration Remote. SIAC [online]. August 2020 [cit. 6. 6. 2021]. Available at: https://www.siac.org.sg/images/stories/documents/siac_guides/SIAC%20Guides%20-%20Taking%20Your%20Arbitration%20Remote%20(August%202020).pdf