Inquiry in University Mathematics Teaching and Learning. The Platinum Project



Arslan, S. (2010). Do students really understand what an ordinary differential equation is? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(7), 873–888.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. ERIC.

Børte, K., Nesje, K., & Lillejord, S. (2020). Barriers to student active learning in higher education, Teaching in Higher Education.

Breen, S., O’Shea, A., & Pfeiffer, K. (2013). The use of unfamiliar tasks in first year calculus courses to aid the transition from school to university mathematics. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser & M. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2316–2325). ERME.

Cobb, P. (2000). Conducting classroom teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers. In R. Lesh & E. Kelly (Eds.), New methodologies in mathematics and science education (pp. 307– 334). Erlbaum.

Devlin, K. (2001). The real reason why software engineers need math. Communications of the ACM, 44(10), 21–22.

Ditcher, A. K. (2001). Effective teaching and learning in higher education, with particular reference to the undergraduate education of professional engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(1), 24–29.

Dorée, S.  I.  (2017).  Turning  routine  exercises  into  activities  that  teach  inquiry:  A  practical  guide. PRIMUS, 27(2), 179–188.

Francis, D. C. (1972). Differential equations in engineering courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 3(3), 263–268.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211.

Klymchuk, S. (2015). Provocative mathematics questions: drawing attention to a lack of attention. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 34(2), 63–70.

Kwon, O. N., Rasmussen, C., & Allen, K. (2005). Students’ retention of mathematical knowledge and skills in differential equations. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 227–239.

Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194.

Raychaudhuri, D. (2007). A layer framework to investigate student understanding and application of the existence and uniqueness theorems of differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(3), 367–381.

Raychaudhuri, D. (2013). A framework to categorize students as learners based on their cognitive practices while learning differential equations and related concepts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(8), 1239–1256.

Rogovchenko, S., Rogovchenko, Y., & Treffert-Thomas, S. (2020). The use of nonstandard problems in an ordinary differential equations course for engineering students reveals commognitive conflicts. In S. S. Karunakaran, Z. Reed & A. Higgins (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 1141–1145). The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Under- graduate Mathematics Education.

Simon, M. A., & Tzur, R. (2004). Explicating the role of mathematical tasks in conceptual learning: An elaboration of the hypothetical learning trajectory. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 91–104.

Swan, M. (2020). Design research in mathematics education. In: S. Lerman S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 192–195). Springer Verlag.

Treffert-Thomas, S., Rogovchenko, S., & Rogovchenko, Y. (2018). The use of nonstandard problems  in  an  ODE  course  for  engineers.  In  E.  Bergqvist,  M.  Österholm,  C.  Granberg  &  L.  Schuster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 283–290). IGPME.