Argumentation 2021. International Conference on Alternative Methods of Argumentation in Law

Kapitola

Abstrakt

This paper deals with the metaphor ‘law is language’ coined by James Boyd White and how it can be useful to understand the concept of legal language, connections between law and language and how the term language is used in the legal realm. In the beginning, the article aims to give an overview of possible approaches to legal language and continues with further analysis of one of them (the above-mentioned White’s proposition). By applying a semiotic approach to this concept, namely Saussure’s theory of distinguishing between langue (language) and parole (speaking), the paper helps to understand that language (and even legal language) can be understood in two different forms. It can be either considered an abstract system of signs, or it can be comprehended as individual speech acts – langue and parole, respectively. White’s metaphor is usually used in the meaning of texts, way of reading, writing and speaking. However, such conception corresponds to language in the sense of parole. These considerations lead at the end of the article towards the communicative theory of law and its merits to jurisprudence. According to a given doctrine, in some instances it can be more accurate to consider law as communication rather than language (and vice versa). Nevertheless, in either case, it is essential to bear in mind the distinction between both of the concepts.

Klíčová slova

Legal Language; James Boyd White; Law is Language; Communication; Semiotics.


Reference

Antonov, M. (2015) Thinking Law as Communication. Review of Central and East European Law [online]. 40, pp. 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04002002. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/rsl40&div=15 [cit. 21. 4. 2020]. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04002002

Bečka, J. V. (1992) Česká stylistika. Praha: Academia.

Bhatia, V. (1987). Language of the law. Language Teaching [online]. 20(4), pp. 227–234. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-teaching/article/abs/language-of-the-law/1E5F4AA7C1DEE0DA1D55EFAAC6A85A65 [cit. 15. 7. 2021].

Broekman, J. M. (2013) Lawyers making meaning: The semiotics of law in legal education II. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5458-4

Broekman, J. M. (2019) Rethinking law and language: The flagship ‘speech’. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788976626

Cao, D. (2007) Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599552

Cover, R. M. (1983) Foreword. Nomos and narrative. Harvard Law Review [online]. 97, pp. 4–68. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/hlr97&i=21 [cit. 16. 2. 2020].

Čermák, F. (2007) Ferdinand de Saussure a jeho Kurs. In: Saussure, Ferdinand de. Kurs obecné lingvistiky. Praha: Academia.

Čermák, F. (2011) Jazyk a jazykověda: přehled a slovníky. Praha: Karolinum.

Fiske, J. (2011) Introduction to communication studies. 3. edition. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203837382

Garner, B. A., Ginsburg, R. B. (2009) Garner On Language and Writing: Selected Essays and Speeches of Bryan A. Garner. Chicago: ABA Defending Liberty Pursuing Justice.

Glogar, O. (2020) Právo jako komunikace. Master’s thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law. Available at: https://is.muni.cz/th/wxiq5/ [cit. 18. 7. 2021].

Greenberg, M. (2011) Legislation As Communication? Legal Interpretation and the Study of Linguistic Communication. In: Marmor, A., Soames, S. (eds.). Philosophical foundations of language in the law [online]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 217–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572380.003.0010. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1726567 [cit. 21. 4. 2020]. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199572380.003.0010

Hart, H. L. A. (2012) The Concept of Law. 3. edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hatz, H. (1963) Rechtssprache und juristischer Begriff. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer Verlag.

Hoecke, M. (2002) Law as communication. Oxford: Hart.

Homoláč, J., Mrázková, K. (2016) Sféra institucionální komunikace. In: Hoffmannová, J. et al. Stylistika mluvené a psané češtiny. Praha: Academia.

Jackson, B. (1995) Making Sense in Law: linguistic, psychological and semiotic perspectives. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.

Knapp, V. (1978) Právní pojmy a právní terminologie (Právní pojmosloví a názvosloví). Státní správa: Bulletin Ústavu státní správy v Praze [online]. 4(5), p. 5–68. Available at: https://is.muni.cz/el/1422/jaro2008/CM218Zk/um/3533856/3533878/?lang=en [cit. 15. 2. 2021].

Kosonogova, O. (2016) Legal Communication: Verbal and Nonverbal Communication in the Practice of Law. US-China Law Review [online]. 13, pp. 705–715. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/uschinalrw13&i=701 [cit. 20. 2. 2020].

Marmor, A. (2008) The Pragmatics of Legal Language. Ratio Juris, 21, pp. 423–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00400.x

Mellinkoff, D. (1963) The Language of the Law. Oregon: Resource Publications.

Mooney, A. (2014) Language and law. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01796-3

Mouritsen, S. C. (2010) The Dictionary Is Not a Fortress: Definitional Fallacies and a Corpus-Based Approach to Plain Meaning. Brigham Young University Law Review [online]. 5, pp. 1915–1980. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/lawreview/vol2010/iss5/10 [cit. 5. 5. 2021]

Myška, M., Smejkalová, T., Šavelka, J., Škop, M. (2012) Creative Commons and Grand Challenge to Make Legal Language Simple. In: Palmirani, M., Pagallo, U., Casanovas, P., Sartor G. (eds.). AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents [online] Berlin: Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp. 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_19. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-35731-2.pdf [cit. 18. 7. 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_19

Nekula, M. (2012–2018) Langue a parole. In: Pleskalová, J., Karlík, P., Nekula, M. (eds.). CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny [online]. Brno: Masaryk University. Available at: https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/LANGUE%20A%20PAROLE [cit. 8. 2. 2020].

Poggi, F. (2011) Law and Conversational Implicatures. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law – Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique [online]. 24, pp. 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9201-x. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11196-010-9201-x.pdf [cit. 23. 2. 2020]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9201-x

Poggi, F. (2016) Grice, the Law and the Linguistic Special Case Thesis. In: Capone, A., Poggi, F. (eds.) Pragmatics and law: philosophical perspectives. Cham: Springer, pp. 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30385-7_11

Saussure, F. (1959) Course in General Linguistics [online]. New York: Philosophical Library. Available at: https://archive.org/details/courseingenerall00saus/page/n11/mode/2up [cit. 15. 7. 2021].

Skoczeń, I. (2019) Implicatures within Legal Language. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12532-5

Solan, L., Gales, T. (2017) Corpus Linguistics as a Tool in Legal Interpretation. Brigham Young University Law Review [online]. 6, pp. 1311–1358. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329019956_Corpus_Linguistics_as_a_Tool_in_Legal_Interpretation [cit. 5. 5. 2021]

Škop, M. (2013) …právo, jazyk a příběh. Praha: Auditorium.

Škop, M. et al. (2019) Tvorba práva – empirické studie. Brno: Masaryk University.

Tiersma, P. M. (2000) Legal Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Tomášek, O. (2003) Překlad v právní praxi. Praha: Linde.

Vučka, J. (2019) Právní psaní. Praha: C. H. Beck.

Weinberger, O. (1995) Norma a instituce: (úvod do teorie práva). Brno: Masaryk University.

White, J. B. (1973) The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227923

White, J. B. (1982) Law as Language: Reading Law and Reading Literature. Texas Law Review [online]. 60, pp. 415–446. Available at: https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tlr60&i=437 [cit. 16. 2. 2020].

White, J. B. (1983) The Invisible Discourse of the Law: Reflections on Legal Literacy and General Education. University of Colorado Law Review [online]. 54, pp. 143–159. Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/2113/ [cit. 15. 7. 2021].

Wittgenstein, L., Anscombe, G. E. M. (1967). Philosophical investigations [online]. 3. edition. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 34–36. Available at: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54889e73e4b0a2c1f9891289/t/564b61a4e4b04eca59c4d232/1447780772744/Ludwig.Wittgenstein.-.Philosophical.Investigations.pdf [cit. 14. 7. 2021].