Current Trends in Public Sector Research. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference

Kapitola

An Assessment of the Public Financial Indicators with Budget Data in Turkey: Review post- 2000

Belkıs Nur BEKTAŞ, Özhan Nur ÇETİNKAYA
Rok vydání: 2020

https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9646-2020-1
An Assessment of the Public Financial Indicators with Budget Data in Turkey: Review post- 2000 pdf, 200KB

Abstrakt

There have been changes in public financial indicators in Turkey after the year of 2000. In this paper, these changes were evaluated together with the budget data. In this context, this paper aims to reveal positive or negative effects of budget data on public financial indicators. The 2008 global financial crisis formed the external direction of the negativity in public financial indicators. In particular, before and after 2008, negative developments have been experienced in public financial indicators except for some years. The 2008 global financial economic crisis had also negative impacts on public financial indicators. Moreover, both general and local elections are a negative factor in public spending discipline in Turkey. Since the local elections, the ruling government has chosen extender budget policies as fiscal policies to win the elections. According to the findings of this study, it was determined that Turkey moved away from the Maastricht criteria after 2008, which stemmed from negative developments in budget data.

Klíčová slova

Public Financial Indicators; Budget Data; Primary Surplus; Public Debt; Fiscal Discipline

Reference

  • ATKINSON, P., NOURD, P. 2001. Managing Public Expenditure: Some Emerging Policy Issues and a Framework for Analysis. OECD Economic Department Working Paper No.285. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2094463
  • SCHICK, A. 2001. Reflections on the New Zealand Model, Available on treasury.govt.nz/academiclinkages/schick/paper.asp.
  • TOKATLIOĞU, M., SELEN, U. 2017. Maliye Politikası, Ekin Kitapevi.
  • GÖKTAŞ, Ö. 2008. Türkiye Ekonomisinde Bütçe Açığının Sürdürülebilirliğinin Analizi. İktisat Fakültesi Ekonometri ve İstatistik Dergisi; 8: 45–64.
  • KESİK, A. 2003. Bütçe Yönetimi Ile Borç Yönetiminin Ayrılmasının Konsolide Bütçeye Yansımaları, XVIII. Türkiye Maliye Sempozyumu; 1–13.
  • GOLDSTEIN, M. 2005. Debt Sustainability, Brazil, and the IMF. SSRN Electronic Journal; 03(1): 1–34, doi:10.2139/ssrn.384022.
  • TOMMASI, D., ALLENİ R. 2001. Managing Public Expenditure : A Reference Book for Transition Countries. OECD Publising.
  • DARICI, H. 2004. Faiz Dışı Fazla Niçin Yeterli Olmuyor?., Maliye Dergisi; 146: 58-68.
  • TÜLAYKAN, H. 2016. Faiz Dışı Fazla ve Bütçe Verileri Arasında Nedensellik İlişkisi, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi; 7(1): 301-322.
  • CANSIZ, H. 2006. Türkiye’de Devlet Bütçelerinin Değişen Hedefi: Faiz Dışı Fazla Kavramı, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi; 8(1): 41-65.
  • EMIL, F., YILMAZ, H. 2003. Kamu Borçlanması, İstikrar Programları ve Uygulanan Maliye Politikalarının Kalitesi: Genel Sorunlar ve Türkiye Üzerine Gözlemler, ERC Working Papers in Economics; 3(7):1-54.
  • HAMILTON, J. D., FLAVIN, M. A. 1986. On the Limitations of Government Borrowing: A Framework for Empirical Testing, American Economic Review; 76 (4): 809-819.
  • BUITER, W. H. 1985. A Guide to Public Sector Debt and Deficits, Economic Policy: A European Forum; 1:13-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1344612
  • KUMAR, M.S., TER-MINASSIAN T. 2007. Promoting Fiscal Discipline, International Monetary Fund.
  • ALESINA, A., PEROTTI, R. 1996. Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process, The American Economic Review; 86(2) Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association San Francisco, 401-40.
  • MORENO, R., 2003. Fiscal Issues and Central Banking in Emerging Economies. BIS Papers No. 20.
  • ŞEN, H., SAĞBAŞ, İ., KESKİN, A. 2010. Türkiye’de Mali Sürdürülebilirliğin Analizi:1975-2007, Maliye Dergisi; 158.
  • GÜRDAL, T., 2008. Türkiye’de Faiz Dışı Fazla ve Borçların Sürdürülebilirliği (1975-2007 Dönemi), Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi; 10 (2).
  • BUDINA, E., VAN WIJNBERGEN, S., 2008. Quantitative Approaches to Fiscal Sustainability Analysis: A Case Study of Turkey Since the Crisis of 2001, The World Bank Economic Review; 1-22, doi:10.1093/wber/lhn011.