Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century

Kapitola

Abstrakt

This contribution to the conference proceedings aims to describe the current views on the applicability of the Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I Regulation) in international commercial arbitration. By means of literature review, the author introduces the arguments in favour and against its binding application before the arbitral tribunals. Furthermore, the author explains the consequences of its (non)application by an example of Czech law. Finally, the author draws attention to the difficulty of the proper application of EU law in arbitration on account of the Nordsee case.

Klíčová slova

Rome I Regulation; EU Law; International Commercial Arbitration; Choice of Law; Determination of Applicable Law; Preliminary Reference.


Reference

Babić, D. Rome I Regulation: binding authority for arbitral tribunals in the European Union? Journal of Private International Law. 2017, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2017.1288471

Basedow, J. EU Law in International Arbitration: Referrals to the European Court of Justice. Journal of International Arbitration. 2015, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 367–386.

Basedow, J. The Transformation of the European Court of Justice and Arbitration Referrals. In: Ferrari, F. (ed.). The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration. New York: Juris. 2017, pp. 125–138.

Bělohlávek, A. J. Law Applicable to the Merits of International Arbitration and Current Developments in European Private International Law: Conflict-of-Laws Rules and the Applicability of the Rome Convention, Rome I Regulation and Other EU Law Standards in International Arbitration. Czech Yearbook of International Law. 2010, Vol. 1, pp. 25–45.

Bělohlávek, A. J. Rome Convention, Rome I Regulation: commentary. New York: Juris, 2010, 2908 p.

Bělohlávek, A. J. Zákon o rozhodčím řízení a o výkonu rozhodčích nálezů. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2012, 1776 p.

Born, G. International Commercial Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014, 4408 p.

Bříza, P. Zákon o mezinárodním právu soukromém: komentář. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2014, 768 p.

Calvo Caravaca, A. L., Carrascosa González, J. Art. 1. In: Magnus, U., Mankowski, P. European commentaries on private international law (ECPIL): commentary. Vol. II, Rome I regulation. Köln: Otto Schmidt, 2017, pp. 52–87.

De Miguel Asensio, P. A. The Rome I and Rome II Regulations in International Commercial Arbitration. In: Ferrari, F. (ed.). The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration. New York: Juris, 2017, pp. 177–243.

Grimm, A. Applicability of the Rome I and II Regulations to International Arbitration. In: Risse, J., Pickrahn, G. et al. (eds.). SchiedzVZ. 2012, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 189–200.

Hausmann, R. Anwendbares Recht vor deutschen und italienischen Schiedsgerichten – Bindung an die Rom I-Verordnung oder Sonderkollisionsrecht? In: Kronke, H., Thorn, K. Grenzen überwinden – Prinzipien bewahren. Festschrift für Bernd von Hoffmann zum 70. Geburtstag. Bielefeld: Gieseking Verlag, 2011, pp. 971–986.

Lüttringhaus, J. D. Art. 1 para. 2. In: Ferrari, F. Rome I Regulation Pocket Commentary. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2015, pp. 23–70.

Mankowski, P. Rom I-VO und Schiedsverfahren. Recht der internationalen Wirtshcaft. 2011, No. 1, pp. 30–44.

Plender, R., Wilderspin M. The European private international law of obligations. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2009, 1158 p.

Ragno, F. Art. 3. In: Ferrari, F. Rome I Regulation Pocket Commentary. Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2015, pp. 73–118.

Schelkoplyas, N. The Application of EC law in Arbitration Proceedings. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2003, 488 p.

Szpunar, M. Referrals of Preliminary Questions by Arbitral Tribunals to the CJEU. In: Ferrari, F. (ed.). The Impact of EU Law on International Commercial Arbitration. New York: Juris, 2017, pp. 85–123.

Yüksel, B. The Relevance of the Rome I Regulation to International Commercial Arbitration in the European Union. Journal of International Private Law. 2011, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 149–178. https://doi.org/10.5235/174410411795375588